Richards v The Queen
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 19 October 1992 |
| Date | 19 October 1992 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
25 cases
-
Tapper el al v Director of Public Prosecutions el al
...Magistrate's Court does not constitute a breach of established procedure, he submitted. Reliance was placed on R. v. Lloydell Richards [1993] A.C. 217 and R. v. Louis Chen 9 J.L.R. 290. 100 As regards legitimate expectations, he submitted that this concept is inextricably bound up with the ......
-
Cleary v DPP
...v O'SHEA 1982 IR 384 STATE (TYNAN) v KEANE 1968 IR 348 S (D) v JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT & ANOR 2008 4 IR 379 RICHARDS v THE QUEEN 1993 AC 217 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1993 S4 SUMMARY JURISDICTION ACT 1857 S2 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 1967 S1(A) CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1999 S9 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE......
-
R v Michael Edwin Reynolds
...solution in such a case might be to recharge the offender. Because he has not been punished, he cannot plead autrefois convict: see Richards v R [1993] AC 217. But that would be a cumbersome way to put right what could be considered a mere technicality, if the ultimate sentence is otherwise......
-
R v Lama
...been convicted by a court of competent jurisdiction. Third, he must have been subjected in Nepal to a criminal punishment: Richards v. R[1993] AC 217 (PC). If the accused cannot bring himself strictly within those requirements, the Court has a residual power to prevent unfairness and the ab......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
A Theoretical Model for Correctional Education in the U.S.A.
...L.L.M.The UniversityofSheffield Legal Correspondentofthe Police JournalRECENT JUDICIAL DECISIONSDOUBLE JEOPARDYRichards v. The Queen[1992] 3 W.L.R. 928 Privy CouncilThe appellant had been arraigned in the Home Circuit Court in Kingston,Jamaica, chargedwith murder. He pleaded guilty to mansl......
-
Recent Judicial Decisions
...L.L.M.The UniversityofSheffield Legal Correspondentofthe Police JournalRECENT JUDICIAL DECISIONSDOUBLE JEOPARDYRichards v. The Queen[1992] 3 W.L.R. 928 Privy CouncilThe appellant had been arraigned in the Home Circuit Court in Kingston,Jamaica, chargedwithmurder. He pleaded guilty to mansla......