Richardson v Blackmore; Capital Cabs Ltd v Blackmore

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Neutral Citation[2005] EWCA Civ 1356
Date2005
Year2005
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
28 cases
  • Amin and Another v Amin & Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 16 March 2010
    ...affect the relief which the court thinks fit to grant…” 415 This proposition is now well-established. In Richardson v Blackmore [2006] BCC 276, CA, Lloyd LJ discussed the effect of the petitioner's misconduct as follows [at 289, paragraph [53]]: “…it seems to me clear that, depending on the......
  • Colm Gerard Corran (Petitioner) v Simon Victor Butters and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 14 September 2017
    ...of any relief which is granted. These propositions are established by Re London School of Electronics Ltd [1986] Ch 211 at 222 B-C, Richardson v Blackmore [2006] BCC 276 and Grace v Biagioli [2006] BCC 85." 119 As to relief, the court has an extremely discretion under s.996 to do what is fa......
  • Patrick Gerard Mckillen v Misland (Cyprus) Investments Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 3 July 2013
    ... ... Mr Patrick McKillen holds 36.2% of the issued share capital of Coroin Limited ("Coroin"). He seeks through this ... ...
  • Hawkes v Cuddy and Others (Nos 1 & 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 13 December 2007
    ...has to consider the application of the equitable principles referred to by Lord Hoffmann in O'Neill v Phillips. In Richardson v Blackmore [2006] BCC 276, a case relied upon by Mr Hollington for another purpose, it was held by the Court of Appeal that there was no requirement that a petition......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • The statutory unfair prejudice remedy for minority shareholder protection in Pakistan. Difficulties of section 290 of the Companies Ordinance 1984
    • United Kingdom
    • Emerald Journal of Financial Crime No. 20-1, December 2012
    • 28 December 2012
    ...of Electronics Ltd [1986] Ch. 211; Re Ringtower Holdings plc [1989] 5 BCC82; Baker v. Potter [2005] BCC 855; Blackmore v. Richardson [2005] EWCA Civ 1356;Grace v. Biagioli [2006] BCC 85.32. Re D. R. Chemicals Ltd [1989] 5 BCC 39; Re Saul D Harrison & Sons plc [1995] 1 BCLC 14;Re BSB Holding......
  • Equity and Trusts
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2010, December 2010
    • 1 December 2010
    ...warranting relief …’: Tan Yong San at [106]. With regard to ‘clean hands’, Loh J referred to the judgment of Richardson v Blackmore [2006] BCC 276 where Lloyd LJ found that although the petitioner had forged a letter, this had no immediate or necessary relation to the petitioner“s claim. Wi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT