Richardson v Blackmore; Capital Cabs Ltd v Blackmore
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2005] EWCA Civ 1356 |
| Date | 2005 |
| Year | 2005 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
27 cases
-
Paul Dinglis v Andreas Dinglis
...is granted. These propositions are established by Re London School of Electronics Ltd [1986] Ch 211 at 222 B-C, Richardson v Blackmore [2006] BCC 276 and Grace v Biagioli [2006] BCC 85.” 80 I note that in the same case, however, HH Judge Stephen Davies also quoted with approval the followi......
-
Saxon Woods Investments Ltd (a company incorporated under the laws of the Bahamas) v Francesco Costa
...equitable doctrine of clean hands. The approach to this issue in the context of petitions was set out by Lloyd LJ in Richardson v Blackmore [2006] BCC 276 (CA) at [53]: “Nourse J. in Re London School of Electronics Ltd (1985) 1 B.C.C. 99,394 at pp.99,399–99,400 [said that] there is no requi......
-
Amin and Another v Amin & Others
...affect the relief which the court thinks fit to grant…” 415 This proposition is now well-established. In Richardson v Blackmore [2006] BCC 276, CA, Lloyd LJ discussed the effect of the petitioner's misconduct as follows [at 289, paragraph [53]]: “…it seems to me clear that, depending on the......
-
Patrick McKillen (Petitioner) v Misland (Cyprus) Investments Ltd (A Company Registered in Cyprus) and Others
...[1995] BCC 338 and In re Leeds United Holdings Limited [1997] BCC 131. 627 Counsel for Mr McKillen submitted that Blackmore v Richardson [2006] BCC 276 demonstrated that dealings by shareholders concerning their shares may be part of the affairs of the company and found a claim of unfair pr......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
The statutory unfair prejudice remedy for minority shareholder protection in Pakistan. Difficulties of section 290 of the Companies Ordinance 1984
... ... to not less thantwenty percent of the paid-up capital of the company, complains, or complain, or the registraris ... Potter [2005] BCC 855; Blackmore v. Richardson [2005] EWCA Civ 1356;Grace v. Biagioli [2006] ... ...
-
Equity and Trusts
...warranting relief …’: Tan Yong San at [106]. With regard to ‘clean hands’, Loh J referred to the judgment of Richardson v Blackmore [2006] BCC 276 where Lloyd LJ found that although the petitioner had forged a letter, this had no immediate or necessary relation to the petitioner“s claim. Wi......