Riley v DPP
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
| Judgment Date | 2016 |
| Neutral Citation | [2016] EWHC 2531 (Admin) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Date | 2016 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
8 cases
-
Highbury Poultry Farm Produce Ltd v Crown Prosecution Service
...is silent on this topic. 34 Thirdly, Mr Hockman drew strong parallels between the instant case and the decision of this Court in Riley v CPS [2017] 1 WLR 505, where it was held that analogous provisions under the Animal Welfare Act 2006 require proof of mens 35 Fourthly, Mr Hockman submitte......
-
Chesterfield Poultry Ltd v Sheffield Magistrates Court
...v Johnson [2009] EWHC 2702 (Admin) at [33]; Letherbarrow v Warwickshire County Council [2014] EWHC 4820 (Admin) at [17]; Riley v DPP [2016] EWHC 2531 (Admin) at [17]; Woodward at [23(ii)]. (2) This requires careful consideration, so that a prosecutor is entitled to a reasonable time to make......
- R v Woodward and Others
-
The King on the application of Andreas Michli v Westminster Magistrates Court
...from both Johnson and Letherbarrow being recently endorsed by Gross LJ (with whom Andrews J agreed) in Riley v Crown Prosecution Service [2016] EWHC 2531 (Admin), [2017] 1 WLR 505 at [17].” 24 The offence with which the claimant was charged under the 2020 Regulations was a summary offence.......
Get Started for Free
