Roberts v Ramsbottom
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1980 |
| Date | 1980 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
21 cases
-
Mansfield v Weetabix Ltd
...an impaired degree of consciousness because of the malfunction in his brain caused by the deficiency in glucose. 10 The judge followed Roberts v Ramsbottom [1980] 1 W.L.R. 823. In it a motorist was involved in an accident when unknowingly he was suffering from a stroke and was unaware of hi......
-
R. v. Creighton, (1993) 65 O.A.C. 321 (SCC)
..., [1971] 2 Q.B. 691]. So also must a driver who is old or infirm, as distinct from totally unconscious [ Roberts v. Ramsbottom , [1980] 1 W.L.R. 823]." (Emphasis added) [74] The same reasoning applies in the criminal context. [75] We see then that the care required by some activities i......
-
R. v. Creighton, (1993) 157 N.R. 1 (SCC)
..., [1971] 2 Q.B. 691]. So also must a driver who is old or infirm, as distinct from totally unconscious [ Roberts v. Ramsbottom , [1980] 1 W.L.R. 823]." (Emphasis added) [74] The same reasoning applies in the criminal context. [75] We see then that the care required by some activities is gre......
-
R v Goforth,
...Weston, [1971] 2 Q.B. 691]. So also must a driver who is old or infirm, as distinct from totally unconscious. [Roberts v. Ramsbottom, [1980] 1 W.L.R. 823] [Emphasis The same reasoning applies in the criminal context. (Italicized emphasis in original; underlined emphasis added) [187] The exa......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Must the Surgeon Take the Pill? Negligence Duty in the Context of Cognitive Enhancement
...to drive regardless. See, eg, Waugh vJames K Allan Ltd 1964SC 102 (HL); C (A Child) vBurcombe [2003] CLY 3030; Roberts vRamsbottom [1980] 1 WLR 823(QB).77 RvGilbert ( Jean) [2006] EWCA Crim 3276 (CA).Must the Surgeon Take the Pill?© 2014 The Authors. The Modern Law Review © 2014 The Modern ......
-
THE 'REASONABLE TORT VICTIM': CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE, STANDARD OF CARE AND THE 'EQUIVALENCE THEORY'.
...(McPherson JA), citing Morris v Marsden [1952] 1 All ER 925, 927-8. See also Beals v Hayward [1960] NZER 131, 138; Roberts v Ramsbottom [1980] 1 WLR 823, (83) See especially Corr (n 7) 903-4 [15]. (84) It may be that this much is in fact implicit in McPherson JA's reference in Carrier (n 82......