Roberts v Smith
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Exchequer |
| Judgment Date | 09 February 1859 |
| Date | 09 February 1859 |
English Reports Citation: 157 E.R. 861
IN THE COURTS OF EXCHEQUER AND EXCHEQUER CHAMBER
S. C. 28 L. J. Ex. 164. Referred to, Broome v. Speak, [1903] 1 Ch. 596.
roberts v. smith. Feb. 9, 1859.-The plaintiff wrote to the defendant as follows :- " I agree to accept the appointment of secretary of the Lancashire Cotton Mill Company upon the following terms, viz., first, a salary of 3001 per annum, commencing at the present date, if the Company be completely registered and put into operation ; if not, I shall be satisfied with any remuneration for my time and labour you may think me deserving of and your means can afford." The defendant wrote in answer accepting the terms, and adding,-" It is distinctly agreed and understood that if the Company is not formed and carried out, that part of your letter which alludes to your salary be null and void, and that at the expiration of three months it is entirely left to me to give unto you such sum of money as I may deem right as compensation for labour done in the event of the Company not being carried out." The plaintiff rendered some service, but the Company was never formed. Held, that there was no contract upon which the plaintiff could recover any part of the salary. [S. C. 28 L. J. Ex. 164. Referred to, Broome v. Speak, [1903] 1 Ch. 596.] Declaration for money payable by the defendant to the plaintiff for work done and salary due to the plain-[316]-tiff as secretary of the Lancashire Cotton Mill Company (Limited). Pleas. Never indebted and payment. At the trial, before Watson, B., at the Middlesex Sittings in last Hilary Term, it appeared that the defendant was a promoter of a Joint Stock Company about to be foimed, and that, in consequence of an advertisement for a secretary of the Company, the plaintiff went to Manchester and saw the defendant. After some negotiations, it was arranged that the plaintiff should be employed as secretary of the Company, and he wrote to the defendant the following letter:- "Manchester, October 17, 1857. "Dear Sir,-I agree to accept the appointment of secretary of the Lancashire Cotton Mill Company (Limited) upon the following terms, viz, first a salary of 3001. per annum, commencing at the present date, if the Company be completely registered and put into operation ; if not, I shall be satisfied with any remuneration for my time and labour you may think me deserving of and your means can afford. Secondly, upon your furnishing me with the sum of 501. on account of preliminary expenses, I will forthwith proceed to the formation of the Company and its establishment in London by provisionally registering it, taking suitable offices, furnishing them, advertizing and doing all necessary acts towards its formation , such sum of 501., it is understood, is to be expended solely for the purposes of the Company, and for the above object; if any further sum be required, it is to be left to your option according tq the then state of the undertaking, whether you terminate the proceedings or make farther advances; and, further, as a security for the 501. lodged in my hands, or any farther sum advanced me for the purpose of carrying out the Company, I will lodge with you promissory notes for the said [317] 501. or other sums payable on demand, upon the understanding that such promissory note or notes shall not be presented for payment or the sums they represent demanded so long as the funds I have can be shewn to have been legitimately expended in the formation of such Company. If you agree to these...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Stepping Stones Child Care Centre (ACT) Pty Ltd Acn 120 005 503 v Early Learning Services Ltd ACN 123 828 553
...59 Roadshow Entertainment Pty Ltd v (ACN 053 006 269) Pty Ltd (rec & mgr apptd) (1997) 42 NSWLR 462 Roberts v Smith (1859) 4 H & N 315 ; 157 ER 861 Romanos v Pentagold Investments Pty Ltd (2003) 217 CLR 367 Secure Parking (WA) Pty Ltd v Wilson [2005] WASC 264 Secure Parking (WA) Pty Ltd v W......
-
Fluxman v Brittain
...are distinguishable. See Halsbury's Laws of England (Hailsham ed., vol. 22, p. 131, para. 219 and notes (v) and (8) ); Roberts v Smith (157 E.R. 861 at p. 863); and Reeve v Reeve (175 E.R. M. Franks, K.C. (with him I. Isaacs), for the respondent: The onus was on plaintiff even where coupled......