Roebuck v Mungovin
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 03 February 1994 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 03 February 1994 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
152 cases
-
The "Plato"
... ... This is in marked contrast to Roebuck v Mungovin where such evidence was proffered. Prejudice ... Now, has this delay caused any prejudice to the bank ? In my view, it has. There ... ...
-
Hunter v Skingley and Another
...I would decline to accede to the defendant's application, and I would therefore allow this appeal. LORD JUSTICE PHILLIPSRoebuck v. Mungovin [1994] 2 AC 224 with which the other members of the appellate committee agreed, at page 234F: having considered whether it was necessary to adduce spec......
- Negara Properties Sdn Bhd v Akitek Bersekutu, Malaysia
- Balwant Singh Purba v R Rajasingam
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
SELECTED CASE-LAW DEVELOPMENTS IN CIVIL PROCEDURE
...Leal v Dunlop Bio-Processes[1984] 1 WLR 874. 21 See Ord 6, r 4 (SCR), as amended by the SC (Amendment) Rules, 1994 (S 260/94). 22 [1994] 1 ALL ER 568. 23 (1977) [1991] 1 WLR 683. 24 Per Stephenson LJ. Ibid, at p 688. 25 Ibid, at p 689. 26 Ibid, at p 686—688. 27 [1994] 1 ALL ER 568, at p 575......
-
OF PRICE AND PREJUDICE, WAR AND PEACE — THE USE OF “WITHOUT PREJUDICE”CORRESPONDENCE IN APPLICATIONS FOR STRIKING OUT AN ACTION FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
...Ltd[1968] 2 WLR 366 and Wee Siew Noi v. Lee Mun Tuck[1993] 2 SLR 232. See also the recent House of Lords decision of Roebuck v. Mungovin[1994] 2 WLR 290. 4 See Walker v. Wilsher(1889) Q.B. 335. 5 Ibid. at page 338. 6 Ibid. at page 338. 7 [1987] 1 All ER 345. 8 Ibid. at page 347. 9 Ibid. at ......