Ropac Ltd v InntrepreneurPub Company (CPC) Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2001 |
| Year | 2001 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
28 cases
-
Yeo Boong Hua and Others v Turf City Pte Ltd and Others and Another Suit
...Fivecourts Limited v JR Leisure Development Co Ltd [2000] WL 141246 (QBD) (“Fivecourts”) and Ropac Ltd v Inntrepreneur Pub Co (CPC) Ltd [2001] CP Rep 31 (“Ropac”) in support of their argument that this court has jurisdiction to make further substantive orders in this case. They also charact......
-
Leslie Dacosta Williams v Teleith Evelyn Williams
...which rely on similar provisions in their CPR, it is prudent to consider such cases as Ropac Limited v Inntrepreneur Pub Co (CPC) Ltd [2001] CP Rep 31; [2000] Lexis Citation 1350, and Chaggar v Chaggar and another [2002] EWCA Civ 1637; [2002] ALL ER (D) 64 In Ropac, Neuberger J (as he then......
-
Knowsley Housing Trust v White ; Porter v Shepherds Bush Housing Association
...cases in which the power in the sub-paragraph has been exercised to extend time. In Ropac Limited v Inntrepreneur Pub Company (CPC) Ltd [2001] L&TR 10, Neuberger J held that the sub-paragraph could be used to extend time for compliance with the terms of a consent order under which time had ......
-
Log Book Loans Ltd & Nine Regions Ltd GC 1048 2011
...this case. Even in relation to substantive consent orders both Neuberger J (as he then was) in Ropac Ltd v Inntrepeneur Pub Co (CPC) Ltd [2001] CP Rep 31 and the Court of Appeal in Weston v Dayman [2006] EWCA Civ 1165 held that there is power under the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) to extend ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Civil Procedure
...at [10], citing Fivecourts Ltd v JR Leisure Development Co Ltd2000 WL 1421246 (QBD) and Ropac Ltd v Inntrepreneur Pub Co (CPC) Ltd[2001] CP Rep 31. Even if the consent order includes a ‘liberty to apply’ clause, this only entitles the court ‘to construe its own orders and provide clarificat......