Rose and Others against Miles

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date02 May 1815
Date02 May 1815
CourtCourt of the King's Bench

English Reports Citation: 105 E.R. 773

IN THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH.

Rose and Others against Miles

See Anglo-Algerian S. S. Company v. Houlder Line, [1908] 1 K. B. 665.

.4M. &S.101. ,f ROSE V. MILES 773 101] kose and others against miles. Tuesday, May 3d, 1815. Where plaintiff declared that before and at the time of committing the grievance, he was navigating his barges laden with goods along a public navigable creek, and that defendant wrongfully moored a barge across, and kept the same so moored, from thence hitherto, and thereby obstructed the public navigable creek, and prevented the plaintiff from navigating his barges so laden, per quod plaintiff was obliged to convey his goods a great distance over land, and was put to trouble and expence in the carriage of his goods over land: Held that this was such a special damage for which an action upon the case would lie. [See Anglo-Algerian S.S. Company v. Roulder Line, [1908] 1 K. B. 665.] Error to reverse a judgment of the Common Pleas. The plaintiff declares in one of the counts, that whereas the plaintiff before and at the time of committing the grievances by the defendants, was lawfully possessed of certain barges and other craft laden with goods, wares, and merchandizes of the plaintiff, and just before and at the time of committing the grievances was navigating his said barges and craft so laden along a certain navigable creek, part of a certain public river, situate, &c., yet the defendants well...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Michael John Smith v Fonterra Co-operative Group Ltd
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • February 7, 2024
    ...L Prosser “Private Action for Public Nuisance” (1966) 52 Va L Rev 997 at 1005 citing, among other things, Rose v Miles (1815) 4 M & S 101, 105 ER 773 150 Mayor of Kaiapoi v Beswick (1869) 1 NZCA 192. Arney CJ, for instance, canvassed the English case law before summarising it in this way (a......
  • Brodie v Singleton Shire Council
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • May 31, 2001
    ...1194]; Paine v Partrich (1691) Carth 191 [ 90 ER 715]; Iveson v Moore (1699) 1 Ld Raym 486 [ 91 ER 1224]; Rose v Miles (1815) 4 M & S 101 [ 105 ER 773]; Chichester v Lethbridge (1738) Willes 71 [ 125 ER 1061]; Greasly v Codling (1824) 2 Bing 263 [ 130 ER 307]; Wilkes v Hungerford Market Co ......
  • Michael John Smith v Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited
    • New Zealand
    • Supreme Court
    • February 7, 2024
    ...L Prosser “Private Action for Public Nuisance” (1966) 52 Va L Rev 997 at 1005 citing, among other things, Rose v Miles (1815) 4 M & S 101, 105 ER 773 Mayor of Kaiapoi v Beswick (1869) 1 NZCA 192. Arney CJ, for instance, canvassed the English case law before summarising it in this way (at 20......
  • Dwyer v Mansfield
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... In an action by the keepers of those shops against the defendant, the judge found that neither nuisance nor damage to the ... 132, at times up to, and at others beyond, Kornfield's shop. The queues appeared late in January or February, ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles