Rose and Others against Miles
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 02 May 1815 |
| Date | 02 May 1815 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 105 E.R. 773
IN THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH.
See Anglo-Algerian S. S. Company v. Houlder Line, [1908] 1 K. B. 665.
.4M. &S.101. ,f ROSE V. MILES 773 101] kose and others against miles. Tuesday, May 3d, 1815. Where plaintiff declared that before and at the time of committing the grievance, he was navigating his barges laden with goods along a public navigable creek, and that defendant wrongfully moored a barge across, and kept the same so moored, from thence hitherto, and thereby obstructed the public navigable creek, and prevented the plaintiff from navigating his barges so laden, per quod plaintiff was obliged to convey his goods a great distance over land, and was put to trouble and expence in the carriage of his goods over land: Held that this was such a special damage for which an action upon the case would lie. [See Anglo-Algerian S.S. Company v. Roulder Line, [1908] 1 K. B. 665.] Error to reverse a judgment of the Common Pleas. The plaintiff declares in one of the counts, that whereas the plaintiff before and at the time of committing the grievances by the defendants, was lawfully possessed of certain barges and other craft laden with goods, wares, and merchandizes of the plaintiff, and just before and at the time of committing the grievances was navigating his said barges and craft so laden along a certain navigable creek, part of a certain public river, situate, &c., yet the defendants well...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Michael John Smith v Fonterra Co-operative Group Ltd
...L Prosser “Private Action for Public Nuisance” (1966) 52 Va L Rev 997 at 1005 citing, among other things, Rose v Miles (1815) 4 M & S 101, 105 ER 773 150 Mayor of Kaiapoi v Beswick (1869) 1 NZCA 192. Arney CJ, for instance, canvassed the English case law before summarising it in this way (a......
-
Brodie v Singleton Shire Council
...1194]; Paine v Partrich (1691) Carth 191 [ 90 ER 715]; Iveson v Moore (1699) 1 Ld Raym 486 [ 91 ER 1224]; Rose v Miles (1815) 4 M & S 101 [ 105 ER 773]; Chichester v Lethbridge (1738) Willes 71 [ 125 ER 1061]; Greasly v Codling (1824) 2 Bing 263 [ 130 ER 307]; Wilkes v Hungerford Market Co ......
-
Michael John Smith v Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited
...L Prosser “Private Action for Public Nuisance” (1966) 52 Va L Rev 997 at 1005 citing, among other things, Rose v Miles (1815) 4 M & S 101, 105 ER 773 Mayor of Kaiapoi v Beswick (1869) 1 NZCA 192. Arney CJ, for instance, canvassed the English case law before summarising it in this way (at 20......
- Dwyer v Mansfield
-
Public Nuisance and Climate Change: The Common Law's Solutions to the Plaintiff, Defendant and Causation Problems
...cases involvingpollution aectingcommercial shermen. See for example Union Oil Co vOppen 501 F2d 558 (9th Cir, 1974).53 (1815) 4 M&S 101, 105 ER 773. Richard Epstein has argued that the English courts made a‘categorical rule’ that apart from those who were personally injured or denied acce......