Rosemary Burr (Petitioner) v Alan Howard Harrison and Others

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeLORD JUSTICE WAITE,LORD JUSTICE NEILL
Judgment Date25 March 1994
Judgment citation (vLex)[1994] EWCA Civ J0325-5
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Docket NumberNo. CHANI 92/0960B
Date25 March 1994
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
178 cases
  • John Seneschall v Trisant Foods Ltd ((in Liquidation))
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 3 May 2023
    ...complained of must be both unfair and prejudicial; the components are distinct. As was said by Neill LJ in Re Saul D Harrison & Sons plc [1995] 1 BCLC 14, at 31c. “ The conduct must be both prejudicial (in the sense of causing prejudice or harm to the relevant interest) and also unfairly so......
  • Hale v Waldock and Metropolis Motorcycles Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 6 March 2006
    ...it has jurisdiction to grant relief. It is clear from the legislative history (which I discussed in In re Saul D. Harrison & Sons Plc. [1995] 1 B.C.L.C. 14, 17–20) that it chose this concept to free the court from technical considerations of legal right and to confer a wide power to do what......
  • De Sousa and Another v Technology Corporate Management (Pty) Ltd and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...O’Neill above [36] (at 970d–f)isrelevant to the question of legitimate expectations of a shareholder:‘In Re Saul D Harrison & Sons plc [1995] 1 BCLC 14 at 19, I used theterm ‘‘legitimate expectation’’, borrowed from public law, as a label forthe ‘‘correlative right’’ to which a relationship......
  • Akira Sales & Services (M) Sdn Bhd v Nadiah Zee binti Abdullah (and Another Appeal
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
12 books & journal articles
  • SOME CURRENT ISSUES IN SINGAPORE CORPORATE LAW
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2019, December 2019
    • 1 December 2019
    ...whether to grant relief under s 216 of the Companies Act”. 102 [2010] 2 SLR 776 at [78]. 103 See also Re Saul D Harrison & Sons plc [1995] 1 BCLC 14 at 19–20; Eng Gee Seng v Quek Choon Teck [2010] 1 SLR 241; Teo Chong Nghee Patrick v Han Cheng Fong [2014] 3 SLR 595; and Poh Fu Tek v Lee Shu......
  • The statutory unfair prejudice remedy for minority shareholder protection in Pakistan. Difficulties of section 290 of the Companies Ordinance 1984
    • United Kingdom
    • Emerald Journal of Financial Crime No. 20-1, December 2012
    • 28 December 2012
    ...Partners xii Ltd Partnership v. Martin Boughtwood and others [2009] EWHC176 and [2010] EWCA Civ 23.20. See Re Saul D Harrison & Sons plc [1995] 1 BCLC 14; See Re BSB Holdings Limited (No. 2)[1996] 1 BCLC 155; See Re Marchday Group [1998] BCC 800; See O’Neill-v-Phillips [1999]1WLR 1092.21. S......
  • Bibliografie
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Transactions of the Centre for Business Law No. 2004-36, January 2004
    • 1 January 2004
    ...1988), Re (1989) 5 BCC 82Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22Sam Weller & Sons Ltd, Re (1989) 5 BCC 810Saul D Harrison & Sons plc, Re [1995] 1 BCLC 14Scottish Co-operative Wholesale Society v Meyer [1959] AC 324;[1958] 3 All ER 66Sidebottom v Kershaw Leese and Company Limited [1920] 1 Ch......
  • No reflective loss: The English approach reconsidered
    • South Africa
    • Juta Journal of Corporate Commercial Law & Practice No. , April 2021
    • 31 March 2021
    ...and ‘unfairly prejudicial’ in substitute of ‘rights’ and ‘oppression’ and 203 Foss supra note 18.204 Re Saul D Harrison & Sons plc 1995 1 BCLC 14 at 18 (per Hoffman J); See also Davies op cit note 110 at 738. 205 This was to mean that omissions, future conduct or a single conduct were not r......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT