Rosenberg v Cook

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1881
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • Roberts v Crown Estate Commissioners
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 14 March 2007
    ...he obtains exclusive enjoyment of the fee simple (that is why an adverse possessor has a fee simple from day 1 – see Rosenberg v Cook (1881) 8 QBD 162 at 165 CA per Sir George Jessel MR (but obiter so far as concerned Brett and Cotton LJJ). Two things require comment; the fact that on and f......
  • Mabo v State of Queensland (No2)
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 3 June 1992
    ...(1809) 11 East 488, at 495; 103 ER 1092, at 1095 642. Asher v Whitlock; Ex parte WinderELR (1877) 6 Ch D 696; Rosenberg v CookELR (1881) 8 QBD 162 643. Wheeler v BaldwinUNK (1934) 52 CLR 609, at 631–3; Elvis v Archbishop of YorkENRENR (1619) Hob 315, at 322; 80 ER 458, at 464; Pollock and W......
  • Lyons and Carroll's Contract, and The Vendor and Purchaser Act, 1874
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 20 December 1895
    ...and Miller's ContractELR 23 Ch. D. 320. Reid v. Shergold 10 Ves. 370. Richardson v. HarrisonELR 16 Q. B. Div. 85. Rosenberg v. CookELR 8 Q. B. D. 162. Scale v. Rawlins [1892] App. Cas. 342. Scott and Alvarez's ContractENRELR Ibid. 596, and [1895] 2 Ch. D. 603. Shirley v. FisherUNK 47 L. T. ......
  • Central London Commercial Estates Ltd v Kato Kagaku Ltd and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 15 July 1998
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT