Rot v District Court of Lublin Poland

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeMitting J
Judgment Date23 June 2010
Neutral Citation[2010] EWHC 1820 (Admin)
Docket NumberCO/4237/2010
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
Date23 June 2010
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
42 cases
  • The Minister for Justice, Equality & Law Reform v Machaczka
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 12 October 2012
    ...(ADMIN) HOWES v HM ADVOCATE 2010 SCL 341 2010 SLT 337 2009 HCJAC 94 R (ROT) v DISTRICT COURT OF LUBLIN, POLAND 2010 AER (D) 277 (JUL) 2010 EWHC 1820 (ADMIN) R (PROSSER) v SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPT 2010 ACD 57 2010 AER (D) 125 (APR) 2010 EWHC 845 (ADMIN) MIN FOR JUSTICE v JOHNSTON......
  • Agius v Malta
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 15 March 2011
    ...12 of the judgment the District Judge referred to three decisions of Mitting J: (1) Jan Rot v District Court of Lublin, Poland [2010] EWHC 1820 (Admin), (2) Tomasz Dabkowski v District Court in Gorzow, Poland [2010] EWHC 1712 (Admin)and (3) Arvdas Klimas v Prosecutors General Office of Li......
  • Ivan Janovic v Prosecutor General's Office Lithuania
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 25 March 2011
    ...in Lithuania fell below international standards. Applying an earlier decision of his, Jan Rot v District Court of Lublin, [2010] EWHC 1820 (Admin), Mitting J held that, as a matter of principle, where prison conditions in a Category 1 territory were raised as an obstacle to extradition, it......
  • Laszlo Nikolics v The City Court of Szekszard (A Judicial Authority in Hungary)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 31 July 2013
    ...Krolik and others v. Several Judicial Authorities of Poland [2013] 1 WLR 490 at paras 3–7 and Rot v. District Court of Eubin Poland 2010 EWHC 1820 (Admin) at paras 10–11. However, in Agius v. Malta [2011] EWHC 759 (Admin) Sullivan LJ noted that the assumption that the state party to the ECH......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Shrien Dewani: A Guideline Case On Extradition And Mental Health?
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 24 February 2011
    ...One month later, the Administrative Court was again presented with a suicide case. In Jan Rot v District Court of Lublin, Poland [2010] EWHC 1820 (Admin) the Judicial Authority argued that the facts in Jansons - uncontradicted evidence that the requested person who has made a serious attemp......
2 books & journal articles
  • Local law repercussions on EU extradition law
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage New Journal of European Criminal Law No. 8-2, June 2017
    • 1 June 2017
    ...under Article 13 of the Convention. The law remained settled for a year or so,until another ECtHR case brought about a change.27. [2010] EWHC 1820 (Admin), para 11.28. Appl. no. 32733/08.Niblock and Oehmichen Rebuttable presumption of complianceIn 2011, the High Court was led to reconsider ......
  • The European Arrest Warrant: The Role of Judges When Human Rights are at Risk
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage New Journal of European Criminal Law No. 2-2, June 2011
    • 1 June 2011
    ...[2008] ECHR 1781, this principle was rs t applied to an ext radition cas e in R (Jan Rot) v Di strict Court of Lubland , Poland [2010] EWHC 1820 (Admin).29 P. 18. Catherine Hea rd and Daniel Manse ll142 I ntersentiais approach ignores the fact that signatories to the ECHR are frequently f......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT