Routh v Jones

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1947
Year1947
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • Smile Inc. Dental Surgeons Pte Ltd v Lui Andrew Stewart
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 31 July 2012
    ...1, QBD (Eng) (refd) Robb v Green [1895] 2 QB 315, CA (Eng) (refd) Routh v Jones [1947] 1 All ER 179, Ch D (Eng) (refd) Routh v Jones [1947] 1 All ER 758, CA (Eng) (refd) Samsung Semiconductor Europe Ltd v Docherty 2011 SLT 806 (refd) Sandar Aung v Parkway Hospitals Singapore Pte Ltd [2007] ......
  • Lek Gwee Noi v Humming Flowers & Gifts Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 8 April 2014
    ...v CLAAS Medical Centre Pte Ltd [2009] 3 SLR (R) 78; [2009] 3 SLR 78 (refd) Oxford v Moss (1979) 68 Cr App Rep 183 (refd) Routh v Jones [1947] 1 All ER 758 (refd) Sadler v Imperial Life Assurance Co of Canada Ltd [1988] IRLR 388 (refd) Shafron v KRG Insurance Brokers (Western) Inc (2009) 1 S......
  • PH Hydraulics & Engineering Pte Ltd v Intrepid Offshore Construction Pte Ltd and another
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 27 June 2012
    ...to preserve the validity of non-offending parts. Separately, I would note the observation made by Lord Greene MR in Routh v Jones [1947] 1 All ER 758 that while an employer is not entitled to stipulate for protection against competition, the fact that a side effect of a legitimate covenant ......
  • Lek Gwee Noi v Humming Flowers & Gifts Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 8 April 2014
    ...by Mr Tan. T Lucas (1974) There is Court of Appeal authority in England approving Younger LJ’s approach in Attwood: see Routh v Jones [1947] 1 All ER 758 at 764; Jenkins v Reid [1948] 1 All ER 471 at 481. Nevertheless, the weight of modern English authority is that the words of Lord Moulton......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Illegality
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Contracts. Third Edition Vitiating Factors
    • 4 August 2020
    ...practice of his own in that same place and by doing so undermine the business and connection of the [employer]”). 165 Routh v Jones , [1947] 1 All ER 758 (CA); Mills v Gill , [1952] 3 DLR 27 (Ont HCJ). 166 See, for example, SW Strange Ltd v Mann , [1965] 1 All ER 1069 (Ch); Winnipeg Livesto......