Rowden v Dutton Gregory (A Firm)

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CourtEmployment Appeal Tribunal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • Vk and Norfolk County Council and The Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 17 December 2004
    ...solely to his disability they would have been wrong to do so. She was clearly correct to do so. 50 In Rowden v Dutton Gregory (a firm) [2002] ICR 971, Lindsay J said, at 973E-974A: The words "for a reason which relates to the … disability" in section 5(1)(a) are strikingly differe......
  • Lewisham London Borough Council v Malcolm
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 25 June 2008
    ...relate to Mr Malcolm's disability? 10 As well explained by Lindsay J in H J Heinz Co Ltd v Kenrick [2000] ICR 491, para 27, and Rowden v Dutton Gregory [2002] ICR 971, para 5, with reference to section 5 of the Act (which uses similar language) it seems clear that the draftsman of section......
  • McAuley Catholic High School v C and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 11 December 2003
    ...which would have fallen within the expressions of "on the ground of" or "by reason of" the disability: Rowden v. Dutton Gregory (a Firm) [2002] ICR 971 at 973E-974A. 43 The second question that has to be answered requires a comparison between the treatment of the applica......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT