Rowland v Divall

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
64 cases
3 books & journal articles
  • Acquiring Title by Theft
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review Nbr. 65-4, July 2002
    • 1 July 2002
    ...title; but the idea thatthere cannot be a sale unless it confers a good title, deriving from the judgment of Atkin LJ inRowland vDivall [1923] 2 KB 500, 506–507, was exploded long ago: see, for example, D. Tiplady,commenting on the Court of Appeal decision (1988) 51 MLR 240, and R.M. Goode,......
  • MANN V PATERSON CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD: THE INTERSECTION OF DEBT, DAMAGES AND QUANTUM MERUIT.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 44 Nbr. 2, December 2020
    • 1 December 2020
    ...(147) Fibrosa (n 50) 65. See also Watson & Co v Shankland (1871) 10 M 142, 152 (Lord Inglis P). (148) See, eg, Rowland v Divall [1923] 2 KB 500; Guinness Mahon & Co Ltd v Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council [1999] QB 215; Benzline Auto Pte Ltd v Supercars Lorinser Pt......
  • Restitutionary Remedies in the Contractual Context
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review Nbr. 76-3, May 2013
    • 1 May 2013
    ...Baloch, Unjust Enrichment and Contract (Oxford: Hart,2009) 1. In my usage it includes claims arising on frustration.3egRowland vDivall [1923] 2 KB 500.4egDe Bernady vHarding (1853) 8 Exch 822. For convenience, I use ‘quantum meruit’ to includepayment for goods or goods and services under th......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT