Rowling v Takaro Properties Ltd

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CourtPrivy Council
Judgment Date1986
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
97 cases
  • Danns and another v Department of Health
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • The Minister for Communications and Others v Figary Watersports Development Company Ltd
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 3 September 2010
    ...GLENCAR EXPLORATIONS PLC & ANDAMAN RESOURCES PLC v MAYO CO COUNCIL 1993 2 IR 237 1993/3/568 ROWLING & ANOR v TAKARO PROPERTIES LTD 1988 AC 473 1988 2 WLR 418 1988 1 AER 163 FRANCOVICH & ANOR v ITALY 1991 ECR I-5357 1993 2 CMLR 66 1995 ICR 722 EEC REG 3889/89 EEC REG 4024/89 WARD v MCMASTER ......
  • Cromane Seafoods Ltd v Minister for Agriculture
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 22 February 2016
    ...which cases Lord Wilberforce sought to distinguish between policy and operational decisions. Later, in Rowling v. Takaro Properties Ltd. [1988] A.C. 473, Lord Keith, considering the justiciability of policy decisions, stated that policy decisions were ?unsuitable for judicial resolution, of......
  • Glencar Exploration p.l.c. v Mayo County Council (No. 2)
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 19 July 2001
    ...(See page 172.) The existence of a duty of care to take legal advice was also considered by the Privy Council in Rowling v Takaro [1988] A.C. 473, a case which concerned a decision by a New Zealand government minister to refuse his consent under statute to an investment transaction involvi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
  • Case Note: ESTABLISHING A DUTY OF CARE: SINGAPORE’S SINGLE, TWO-STAGE TEST
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal Nbr. 2008, December 2008
    • 1 December 2008
    ...See Leigh and Sillavan Ltd v Aliakmon Shipping Co Ltd[1986] AC 785 at 815 per Lord Brandon of Oakbrook. 36 (1985) 60 ALR 1 at 43—44. 37 [1988] AC 473. 38 Rowling v Takaro Properties Ltd [1988] AC 473 at 501D—F. 39 Spandeck Engineering (S) Pte Ltd v Defence Science & Technology Agency [2......
  • Policing Flawed Police Investigations: Unravelling the Blanket
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review Nbr. 62-6, November 1999
    • 1 November 1999
    ...Functions – Is theDoor Now Ajar?’ (1998) 10 Child and Family LQ 227, 228–232.59 n 43 above.60 [1978] AC 728, 754 per Lord Wilberforce.61 [1988] AC 473, 501 (PC).62 n 8 above, 737–738 per Lord Browne-Wilkinson.63 [1999] 3 WLR 79 (HL), per Lord Slynn, 95–99, and per Lord Hutton, 102–111.64 n ......
  • Public or Private? Duty of Care in a Statutory Framework: Stovin v Wise in the House of Lords
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review Nbr. 60-4, July 1997
    • 1 July 1997
    ...ibid.34 See generally P.P. Craig, Administrative Law (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 3rd ed, 1994) 618–632.35 Rowling vTakaro Properties Ltd [1988] AC 473, 500–501.36 This may explain, in part, why in some cases involving alleged ‘operational’ negligence — notablyclaims against the police — the......
  • Watson v British Boxing Board of Control: Negligent Rule‐Making in the Court of Appeal
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review Nbr. 65-1, January 2002
    • 1 January 2002
    ...purposes of the regulatory scheme, but Watson and Perrett63 See, for example: Yuen Kun Yeu, n 33 above; Rowling vTakaro Properties Ltd [1988] AC 473; XvBedfordshire, n 23 above; Reeman vDepartment of Transport [1997] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 648.64 Indeed, Brodie treats the case as one involving publi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT