ROYAL ENFIELD Trade Marks
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Year | 2002 |
Date | 2002 |
Court | Trade Marks Registry |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
67 cases
- Vibe Technologies Ltd's Application No 2390030
-
McDonald's Corp v Future Enterprises Pte Ltd
...line with authorities. An allegation of bad faith is a serious matter and should not be lightly inferred. In “Royal Enfield” Trade Marks [2002] RPC 24 it was held (at [31]) An allegation that a trade mark has been applied for in bad faith is a serious allegation. … A plea of fraud should no......
-
PT Swakarya Indah Busana v Dhan International Exim Pte Ltd
...observed at [78]: …An allegation of bad faith is a serious matter and should not be lightly inferred. In “Royal Enfield” Trade Marks [2002] RPC 24 it was held (at [31]) An allegation that a trade mark has been applied for in bad faith is a serious allegation…A plea of fraud should not light......
-
Lidl Great Britain Ltd v Tesco Stores Ltd
...faith.” The words in square brackets I have added to the quotation are supported by earlier authority: see e.g. ROYAL ENFIELD Trade Mark [2002] R.P.C. 24 at [31]. 24. As for point 7, it is worth setting out what the General Court said in Hasbro more fully (internal citations omitted): “42. ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Intellectual Property Law
...7(6) of the 1998 Act. The English equivalent of this provision is s 3(6) of the UK Trade Marks Act. Chao JA referred to ‘Royal Enfield’ TM[2002] RPC 24, an English decision on s 3(6) which held that an allegation that a trade mark has been applied for in bad faith should be fully and proper......