Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v Attorney General and Others

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Judgment Date26 January 2001
Date26 January 2001

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Eclairs Group Ltd v JKX Oil & Gas Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 30 August 2013
    ...completely. It does not lead me conclude that natural justice procedures should be imported into article 42. 158 Likewise RSPCA v Attorney-General [2002] 1 WLR 448 is distinguishable. In that case Lightman J had to consider a power (in effect) to reject membership of the society but only (a......
  • Children's Investment Fund Foundation (UK) v Attorney General and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 January 2020
    ...In re; Randell v Dixon (1888) 38 Ch D 213 Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v Attorney General [2002] 1 WLR 448; [2001] 3 All ER 530 Royal Society’s Charitable Trusts, In re [1956] Ch 87; [1955] 3 WLR 342; [1955] 3 All ER 14 S (An Infant), In re [1965] 1 WLR 483; [1965]......
  • The Children's Investment Fund Foundation (UK) v HM Attorney General and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 9 June 2017
    ... ... CHANCERY DIVISION The Rolls Building The Royal Courts of Justice 7 Rolls Building, Fetter Lane, ... Bristol & West Building Society at page 18 as follows:- "A fiduciary is someone ... ...
  • Arthur Williams v Andrew Holness
    • Jamaica
    • Supreme Court (Jamaica)
    • 6 February 2015
    ...(1990) 2 SCR 367; (13) Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyer v Belgium [1981] ECHR 3 (23 June, 1981); and (14) Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v Attorney General [2002] 1 WLR 448. 197 Having considered the evidence within the legal framework provided by the authorities, I m......
  • Get Started for Free