S. (an Infant) v Recorder of Manchester

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Date1969
Year1969
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
178 cases
  • Steward v DPP
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • July 30, 2003
    ...have convicted or acquitted, they are functi officio and cannot alter their decision." Mr Lofthouse additionally relies on S v Recorder of Manchester [1971] AC 481, to which I shall make brief reference later. 8 Mr Lofthouse also observes that the Magistrates' Court Act 1980 contains provis......
  • R v South Tameside Magistrates' Court, ex parte Rowland
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
  • Lee Weng Tuck and Another v PP
    • Malaysia
    • Supreme Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • New Tuck Shen v PP
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • January 1, 1981
  • Get Started for Free
7 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Drink and Drug Drive Case Notes Preliminary Sections
    • August 29, 2015
    ...4003 (Admin)! 147 .......................... Rynsard v Spalding [1986] RTR 303, [1985] Crim LR 795, DC! 311 S v Recorder of Manchester [1971] AC 481, [1970] 2 WLR 21, ............................................................................... ! [1969] 3 All ER 1230, HL! 587 ..................
  • Court of Appeal
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 53-1, February 1989
    • February 1, 1989
    ...of guilt and the termination of a criminalproceeding by a plea or finding of guilt followed by sentence: see Sv. RecorderofManchester [1971]A.C.481.TheCrown claimedthat the second meaning was here the more appropriate, since abankruptcyorderconcerns sentence, and not conviction in thenarrow......
  • Other Issues
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Drink and Drug Drive Case Notes Contents
    • August 29, 2015
    ...do not consider that that comes within the principles set out in the Essex Justices case, or in the case of [ S v Recorder of Manchester [1971] AC 481, [1970] 2 WLR 21, [1969] 3 All ER 1230] in which Lord MacDermott referred … to the point where: ‘... the process of adjudication … had been ......
  • Court of Appeal
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 53-3, August 1989
    • August 1, 1989
    ...the analogy of a finding of guilt by thejustices-thisdoes not meanthatthey are functus officio: see R. v. RecorderofManchester [1971]A.C.481. The court proceeded, however, noton any analogy but on the fact that contempt proceedings are suigeneris. The question here was whether the judge was......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT