S. (an Infant) v Recorder of Manchester
Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
Date | 1969 |
Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
172 cases
-
Steward v DPP
...justices have convicted or acquitted, they are functi officio and cannot alter their decision." Mr Lofthouse additionally relies on S v Recorder of Manchester [1971] AC 481, to which I shall make brief reference later. 8 Mr Lofthouse also observes that the Magistrates' Court Act 1980 contai......
- R v South Tameside Magistrates' Court, ex parte Rowland
- New Tuck Shen v PP
- Lee Weng Tuck and Another v PP
Request a trial to view additional results
7 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...4003 (Admin)! 147 .......................... Rynsard v Spalding [1986] RTR 303, [1985] Crim LR 795, DC! 311 S v Recorder of Manchester [1971] AC 481, [1970] 2 WLR 21, ............................................................................... ! [1969] 3 All ER 1230, HL! 587 ..................
-
Court of Appeal
...of guilt and the termination of a criminalproceeding by a plea or finding of guilt followed by sentence: see Sv. RecorderofManchester [1971]A.C.481.TheCrown claimedthat the second meaning was here the more appropriate, since abankruptcyorderconcerns sentence, and not conviction in thenarrow......
-
Other Issues
...do not consider that that comes within the principles set out in the Essex Justices case, or in the case of [ S v Recorder of Manchester [1971] AC 481, [1970] 2 WLR 21, [1969] 3 All ER 1230] in which Lord MacDermott referred … to the point where: ‘... the process of adjudication … had been ......
-
Court of Appeal
...the analogy of a finding of guilt by thejustices-thisdoes not meanthatthey are functus officio: see R. v. RecorderofManchester [1971]A.C.481. The court proceeded, however, noton any analogy but on the fact that contempt proceedings are suigeneris. The question here was whether the judge was......
Request a trial to view additional results