Sabel BV v Puma AG (Case C-251/95)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Advocate General's Opinion |
| Date | 1997 |
| Year | 1997 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
43 cases
-
3M Company v Manufacturera 3M SA DE CV
...18. Furthermore, according to the case law of the court, the more distinctive the earlier mark, the greater the risk of confusion (see [1997] ECR I-6191 (para 24)). Since protection of a trade mark depends, in accordance with art 4(1)(b) of the directive, on there being a likelihood of conf......
-
General Cigar Company Inc. v Partagas y cia SA
...to analyse its various details. The more distinctive the earlier mark, the greater the risk of confusion: Case C-251/95SABEL v Puma [1997] ECR I-6191; Case C-39/97Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc [1998] ECR I-5507; 117; Case C-342/97Lloyd Schuhfabrik Meyer & Co GmbH v Kl......
-
Red Bull Gmbh v Sun Mark Ltd and Another
...of the European Union in a considerable number of decisions, and in particular the leading cases of Case C-251/95SABEL BV v Puma AG [1997] ECR I-6191, Case C-39/97Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Meyer Inc [1998] ECR I-5507, Case C-342/97Lloyd Schuhfabrik Meyer & Co GmbH v Klijsen......
-
Esure Insurance Ltd v Direct Line Insurance Plc
...concept of similarity in relation to the likelihood of confusion;” - see also Sabel BV v Puma AG, Rudolf Dassler Sport Case C-251/95, [1997] ECR I-6191 the earliest of the ECJ cases to which I was referred and one in which Advocate-General Jacobs refers to the tenth recital and the “concept......
Get Started for Free
