Sachs v Miklos
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1948 |
| Date | 1948 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
60 cases
-
Ningxia Yinchuan Rubber Factory Import And Export Corp and Others v AJ Brendon Shipping Pte Ltd And Others and another action
...the plaintiff`s address and he had tried unsuccessfully to contact her stepfather. The learned judge referred to Sachs v Miklos & Ors [1948] 1 All ER 67 where Lord Goddard CJ said at p 68: Agents of necessity, until very modern times, were confined to two classes of persons, those who accep......
-
Infolines Public Networks Ltd v Nottingham City Council
...its disposal will have been caused by the owner's inaction and could not be recovered by him (see the judgment of Lord Goddard, CJ, in Sachs v Miklos [1948] 2 QB 23 at page 40 —a case of bailment, but one sufficiently analogous, in my view, to provide a practical guide in the present circum......
- Lee Swee Keat and Another; Lee Tai Hoo and Another
- Services Europe Atlantique Sud (SEAS) v Stockholms Rederiaktiebolag Svea (Folias)
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...304 S(K) v H(JP), [2004] BCJ No 1414, 2004 BCSC 769 ........................................... 340 Sachs v Miklos, [1948] 2 KB 23, [1948] 1 All ER 67, [1948] LJR 1012 (CA) ................................................................................................ 84 Sacks v Canada Mor......
-
Compensation for Harm to Property Interests
...until 54 (1982), 18 Man R (2d) 203 (CA). 55 Alberta v Arnold , [1971] SCR 209; Asamera , above note 46; Glazerman , above note 46. 56 [1948] 2 KB 23 (CA). Compensation for Harm to Property Interests 85 some subsequent time). In effect, the owner would be given the value of the goods at the ......
-
Cases referred to in 1989 Part II
...213 S.C.O.A. Limited v. R. 0. Agana (1958) W.R.N.L.R. 141, 144. 183 Sachs v. Miklos (1948) 2 K.B. 23, 38. ......................................................................... 183 Saidu v. The State (1968) 1 All N.L.R. 124. ......48 Saidu v. The State (1982) 4 S C 41 473 Salako v. Oshun......
-
Flexibility of Damages for Conversion and Detinue
...value of the eggs at the date of conversion and their resale value. Similarly, the Court of Appeal in Sachs v Miklos4242Sachs v Miklos [1948] 2 K.B. 23 (CA). disavowed a rigid approach to the assessment of damages for conversion. In that case, a gratuitous bailee (the defendant), was constr......