Said v Butt

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1920
Year1920
Date1920
CourtKing's Bench Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
257 cases
  • Mark Chassy v Left Shift it Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • 4 February 2025
    ...break a contract with a third person.”” 22 Having reviewed the authorities relating to what the judge called the “so-called rule in Said v Butt”, Lane J said this at paragraph 114: “The conclusion of Waller J in Ridgeway Maritime v Beulah Wings Ltd [1991] 2 Lloyd's Rep 611, cited in para 57......
  • Root Quality Pty Ltd v Root Control Technologies Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Ts & B Retail Systems Pty Ltd v 3Fold Resources Pty Ltd (No 3)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Christopher Gary Hoole v Meredith Charles Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 8 March 2024
    ...38 97–146 Repudiatory breach 52 147–160 Causing loss by unlawful means 57 161–181 Procuring breach of contract 65 182–191 Principle in Said v Butt 68 192–205 Unlawful interference with contract 73 206 The “Myers Defence” 74 207–211 Conclusion 76 212–214 2 Mr Hoole is the claimant. He is a f......
  • Get Started for Free
5 firm's commentaries
14 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Partnerships and Corporations. Fourth Edition
    • 5 August 2018
    ...Sabex International Ltée, Re (1979), 6 BLR 65 (Que SC) ................................... 267 Said v Butt, [1920] 3 KB 497, [1920] All ER Rep 232 ..........................433, 434, 435 Salomon v Salomon & Co, [1897] AC 22, [1895–1899] All ER Rep 33, 66 LJ Ch 35, 75 LT 426, 45 WR 193, 4 Ma......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Torts. Sixth Edition
    • 25 June 2020
    ...287 Saelman v Hill, [2004] OJ No 2122, [2004] OTC 440 (SCJ) ............................. 413 Said v Butt, [1920] 3 KB 497 ................................................................................351 Salomon v Matte-Thompson, 2019 SCC 14, [2019] SCJ No 14 .................... 253–54 ......
  • Tort Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2007, December 2007
    • 1 December 2007
    ...and accordingly, caused damage to the plaintiff. 22.22 The court”s decision would not be inconsistent with the principle in Said v Butt[1920] 3 KB 497 and Chong Hon Kuan Ivan v Levy Maurice (No 2)[2004] 4 SLR 801 (which applied Said v Butt). The essence of that principle was that a servant ......
  • TORTIOUS ACTS AND DIRECTORS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2011, December 2011
    • 1 December 2011
    ...Ltd v Ciryl Theatrical Syndicate LtdELR[1924] 1 KB 1; British Thomson-Houston Co Ltd v Stirling Accessories LtdELR[1924] 2 Ch 33. 35[1920] 3 KB 497. 36Said v ButtELR[1920] 3 KB 497 at 505–506. 37 See G Scammell and Nephew v HurleyELR[1929] 1 KB 419; DC Thomson & Co Ltd v DeakinELR[1952] Ch ......
  • Get Started for Free