Saint Line Ltd v Richardsons, Westgarth & Company Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1940
Date1940
CourtKing's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
32 cases
  • British Sugar Plc v NEI Power Projects Ltd [QBD]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • February 21, 1997
    ...considered Millars Machinery Co Ltd v David Way & SonUNK ((1935) 40 Com Cas 204); Saint Line Ltd v Richardsons, Westgarth & Co LtdELR ([1940] 2 KB 99) and Croudance Construction Ltd v Cawoods Concrete Products LtdUNK ([1978] 2 Lloyd's Rep 55) and making allowance for the fact that every cas......
  • Transocean Drilling U.K. Ltd v Providence Resources Plc and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • December 19, 2014
    ...the reasonable contemplation of the parties at the date of contract as the probable result of a breach: see for example Saint Line v Richardsons Westgarth & Co Ltd [1940] 2 KB 49, Deepak fertilisers v ICI Chemicals and Polymers Ltd [1999] 1 Lloyds Rep 387 at pp. 402–3. (2) The spread costs ......
  • London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority v Halcrow Gilbert Associates Ltd and another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • July 31, 2007
    ...loss is limited to the replacement or repair of the ductwork. 386 In support of its case LFEPA refers to two authorities, Saint Line v Richardsons [1940] 2 KB 99 and British Sugar v NEIE Power Projects Ltd [1997] 87 BLR 42. 387 In Saint Line v Richardsons, Atkinson J had to construe the fol......
  • Ferryways NV v Associated British Ports
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • February 14, 2008
    ...the liability of the manufacturer of gravel washing plant for consequential loss), was binding on it. Mention should also be made of Saint Line v Richardsons [1940] 2 KB 99, a decision of Atkinson J. concerning the ambit of a clause which protected an engine builder from “indirect or conseq......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Exclusion of liability for consequential loss in infrastructure contracts
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • September 2, 2014
    ...6Macmahon 1at [30]. 7Macmahon 2 at [3]. 8Macmahon 2 at [8]. 9Macmahon 2at [25]. 10Saint Line Ltd v Richardsons, Westgarth & Co Ltd [1940] 2 KB 99 at [103]. 11Saint Line Ltd v Richardsons, Westgarth & Co Ltd [1940] 2 KB 99 at [103]. 12Macmahon 2at[2014] NSWSC 731 (Macmahon 2). 3In Ma......
2 books & journal articles
  • Digest: Carteri v Saskatchewan Mutual Insurance Co., 2018 SKQB 150
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • May 11, 2018
    ...Red Deer College v Michaels, [1976] 2 SCR 324, [1975] 5 WWR 575, 57 DLR (3d) 386, 5 NR 99 Saint Line v Richardsons, Westgarth & Co., [1940] 2 KB 99 Seaport Crown Fish Co. v Vancouver Port Corp, 19 BCTC 286, 90 ACWS (3d) 711 Syniuk v Kornberger, 2013 SKPC 32, 225 ACWS (3d) 1127 Tchozewsk......
  • Contract Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2006, December 2006
    • December 1, 2006
    ...That would, of course, require us to ignore the learned judge”s reference to Saint Line Limited v Richardsons, Westgarth & Co Limited[1940] 2 KB 99 (‘Saint Line’) as being in support of her construction of the clause, given that Saint Line was concerned with what constituted ‘direct damage’......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT