Salaman v Warner

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1891
Date1891
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
172 cases
  • Lai Swee Lin Linda v Attorney-General
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 7 December 2005
    ...SGCA 10 (refd) Rank Xerox (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Ultra Marketing Pte Ltd [1991] 2 SLR (R) 912; [1992] 1 SLR 73 (folld) Salaman v Warner [1891] 1 QB 734 (not folld) Singapore Press Holdings Ltd v Brown Noel Trading Pte Ltd [1994] 3 SLR (R) 114; [1994] 3 SLR 151 (folld) Stansfield Business Int......
  • Lim Chi Szu Margaret and Another v Risis Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 31 October 2005
    ...known as the “order” test) has been preferred to that laid down in the (also) English Court of Appeal decision of Salaman v Warner [1891] 1 QB 734 (and popularly known as the “application” test), where Fry LJ observed (at 736) [A]n order is “final” only where it is made upon an application ......
  • Jumabhoy Asad v Aw Cheok Huat Mick and Others
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 31 July 2003
    ...themselves.” 10 We are conscious that in England, the test adopted would appear to be the “application” approach: see Salaman v Warner [1891] 1 QB 734, which was applied in White v Brunton [1984] 1QB 571 and this latter case in turn declared that the Bozson’s test was no longer good 11 That......
  • Ruby Investment (Pte) Ltd v Candipark Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 8 August 1989
    ...enunciated in Bozson v Altrincham UDC [1903] 1 KB 547 (the Bozson test) and the second test being the testenunciated in Salaman v Warner [1891] 1 QB 734 (the Salaman test).The distinction between the two tests is that in the Bozson test, one looks at the order or judgment made and asks ones......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
13 books & journal articles
  • Preliminary Sections
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1985. Part I Preliminary Sections
    • 22 November 2022
    ...Singh v. State of Rajasthan AIR (1965) S.C. 855. ........16 Saka v. The State (1981) 11 - 12 S.C. 65. ......227 Salaman v. Warner (1891) 1 Q.B. 734 at 736. ......149 Salawu Atunde v. Commissioner of Police (1952) 14 W.A.C.A. 171 at 173. ............................................................
  • Preliminary Sections
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1967 Preliminary Sections
    • 12 November 2022
    ...v. Western Assurance Co. (1907) Tr.H.C. 257. 152 Sadler v. Evans (1766) 4 Burr. 1985, 1986, 98 E.R. 34, 35 73 Salaman v. Warner & Ors. [1891] 1 Q.B. 734. 46 Savory v. Lloyds Bank Ltd. [1932] 2 K.B. 122 67 Schafer v. Blyth [1920] 3 K.B. 140, 143. 89 Shell Company of Australia Ltd. v. Federal......
  • Cases referred to in 1967
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1967 Preliminary Sections
    • 12 November 2022
    ...v. Western Assurance Co. (1907) Tr.H.C. 257. 152 Sadler v. Evans (1766) 4 Burr. 1985, 1986, 98 E.R. 34, 35 73 Salaman v. Warner & Ors. [1891] 1 Q.B. 734. 46 Savory v. Lloyds Bank Ltd. [1932] 2 K.B. 122 67 Schafer v. Blyth [1920] 3 K.B. 140, 143. 89 Shell Company of Australia Ltd. v. Federal......
  • Digest: Cowessess First Nation No. 73 v Phillips Legal Professional Corporation, 2018 SKQB 156
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • 18 May 2018
    ...[2016] 2 WWR 625 R v Graat, [1982] 2 SCR 819, 144 DLR (3d) 267, 45 NR 451, 2 CCC (3d) 365, 31 CR (3d) 289, 18 MVR 287 Salaman v Warner, [1891] 1 QB 734 Saskatchewan (Attorney General) v Lemare Lake Logging Ltd., [2015] 3 SCR 419, 2015 SCC 53 Saskatchewan Government and General Employees� Un......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT