Same against Roe
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
| Judgment Date | 25 November 1833 |
| Date | 25 November 1833 |
English Reports Citation: 110 E.R. 1010
IN THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH
Same against Roe
doe dem. langdon against langdon. same against eoe. Monday, Nov. 25th, 1833. In a second action of ejectment brought for the same premises, the Court will stay proceedings till the costs of the former are paid, although the former action was discontinued before consent rule or plea. The lessor of the plaintiff having brought two ejectments for the same premises, a rule nisi was obtained by Cowling before Littledale J...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
1 cases
-
JP Morgan Multi-Strategy Fund LP v Macro Fund Ltd
...[1991] 1 W.L.R. 73; [1990] 3 All E.R. 762, dicta of Vinelott J. and Dillon, L.J. followed. (13) Doe v. LangdonENR(1833), 5 B. & Ad. 864; 110 E.R. 1010, referred to. (14) Doherty v. AllmanELR(1878), 3 App. Cas. 709, referred to. (15) English & American Ins. Co. Ltd. v. Herbert SmithUNK(1988)......
