Sanders v Maclean

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date28 April 1883
Date28 April 1883
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
61 cases
  • Barclays Bank Plc v Quincecare Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Toepfer v Lenersan-Poortman N.v
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 25 May 1979
    ...common law obligation accordingly applied. with regard to the nature of the implied obligation at common law, reference can be made to Sanders v. Maclean (1883) 11 Queen1s Bench Division 327, Landauer & Co. v. Craven & Speeding Bros. (1912) 2 King's Bench 94 and Johnson v. Taylor Bros. & C......
  • Armstrong DLW GmbH v Winnington Networks Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 11 January 2012
    ...was probably improper. In this regard it is necessary to bear in mind what Bowen L.J. said in Sanders Bros. v. Maclean & Co. (1883) 11 Q.B.D. 327, 343: "But the practice of merchants, it is never superfluous to remark, is not based on the supposition of possible frauds. The object of mercan......
  • Borealis AB v Stargas Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 22 March 2001
    ...covered by the bill of lading could likewise be delivered. This was an application of the principles of bailment and attornment. ( Sanders v Maclean (1883) 11 QBD 327; Dublin City Distillery v Doherty [1914] AC 823.) In Sanders v Maclean Bowen LJ said at p.341: "The law as to the indorseme......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Forged Bills of Lading
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 13 January 2003
    ...but, to the credit of the industry, such frauds are not that common. As long ago as 1883 Lord Justice Bowen observed in Sanders v Maclean 11 QBD 327: "mercantile genius consists principally in knowing whom to trust and with whom to deal, and commercial intercourse and communication is no mo......
2 books & journal articles
  • RIGHTS UNDER BILLS OF LADING: TRAWLING THROUGH SINGAPORE WATERS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2006, December 2006
    • 1 December 2006
    ...as symbols of the goods by the delivery of which the goods carried under it could be delivered: see Sanders Brothers v Maclean & Co(1883) 11 QBD 327. A negotiable shipped-on-board bill of lading is a document of title: see Sanders Brothers v Maclean & Co, ibid, as is an ordinary received-fo......
  • Admiralty
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon’s Laws of Nigeria. Volume 1 Admiralty
    • 8 September 2016
    ...than one part or copy to different persons. See Glyne v. East & West India Dock Co . (1882) App. Cas. 581, 605; Sandra v. Maclean (1993) 11 Q.B.D. 327.” - Per Galadima, J.C.A. in M. v. “Caroline Maersil” v. Nokoy Invest. Ltd . Suit No. CA/L/316/98; (2000) 7 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 666) 587 at 601. 13......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT