Satef-Huttenes Albertus S.p.A. v Paloma Tercera Shipping Company S.A. (Pegase)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1980
Date1980
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
38 cases
  • Burgundy Global Exploration Corporation v Transocean Offshore International Ventures Ltd
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 14 May 2014
    ...Alpha Fund 1 Ltd Partnership [2013] 4 SLR 1116 (refd) Satef-Huttenes Albertus Sp A v Paloma Tercera Shipping Co SA (The Pegase) [1981] 1 Lloyd's Rep 175 (distd) Seagull Manufacturing Co Ltd, Re [1993] Ch 345 (refd) Serious Organised Crime Agency v Perry [2013] 1 AC 182 (refd) Transocean Off......
  • CHS CPO GmbH (in bankruptcy) and Another v Vikas Goel and Others
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 26 April 2005
    ...J (as he then was) in the English High Court decision of Satef-Huttenes Albertus SpA v Paloma Tercera Shipping Co SA (The Pegase) [1981] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 175 at [T]he test appears to be: have the facts in question come to the defendant’s knowledge in such circumstances that a reasonable person......
  • Out of the Box Pte Ltd v Wanin Industries Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 6 February 2013
    ...from the judgment of Robert Goff J (as he then was) in Satef-Huttenes Albertus SpA v Paloma Tercera Shipping Co SA (The Pegase) [1981] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 175 (“The Pegase”) at 182–3: ... the principle in Hadley v Baxendale is now no longer stated in terms of two rules, but rather in terms of a s......
  • Thoroughbred Breeders' Association v Price Waterhouse
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...(Pty) Ltd 1979 (1) SA 195 (A): compared Taylor v South African Railways and Harbours 1958 (1) SA 139 (D): referred to H The Pagase [1981] 1 Lloyd's Rep 175: dictum at 182 Thoroughbred Breeders' Association of South Africa v Price Waterhouse 1999 (4) SA 968 (W): varied on appeal Tonkwane Saw......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • CONTRACT LAW IN COMMONWEALTH COUNTRIES: UNIFORMITY OR DIVERGENCE?
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2019, December 2019
    • 1 December 2019
    ...v Wanin Industries Pte Ltd [2013] 2 SLR 363 at [37]; see Satef-Huttenes Albertus SpA v Paloma Tercera Shipping Co SA (The Pegase) [1981] 1 Lloyd's Rep 175. 137 Out of the Box Pte Ltd v Wanin Industries Pte Ltd [2013] 2 SLR 363 at [38]. 138 Out of the Box Pte Ltd v Wanin Industries Pte Ltd [......
  • Comparative and normative analysis of damages under the SGA and the CESL.
    • United States
    • St. Thomas Law Review Vol. 26 No. 4, June - June 2014
    • 22 June 2014
    ...See SGA, supra note 1, [section] 51(2); see also Satef-Huttenes Albertus S.p.A. v. Paloma Tercera Shipping Co. S.A. (The "Pegase") [1981] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 175 (Q.B.D.) at 182 (126.) See CESL, supra note 2, art. 161. (127.) See Goode on Commercial Law, supra note 10, at 420 (explaining the rig......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT