Savile v Roberts
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1792 |
| Date | 01 January 1792 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 91 E.R. 1147
COURTS OF KING'S BENCH AND COMMON PLEAS
See Wren v. Weild, 1869, L. R. 4 Q. B. 736; Quartz Hill Gold Mining Company v. Eyre, 1883, 11 Q. B. D. 683; Mogul SS. Company v. M'Gregor, Gow & Company, 1888, 21 Q. B. D. 550; 23 Q. B. D. 598; [1892], A. C. 25; Allen v. Flood [1898], A. C. 55; Walters v. Green [1899], 2 Ch. 701.
[374] savile vers. roberts. Intr. Trin. 9 Will. 3, B. R. Rot. 724. [See Wren, v. WeiLd, 1869, L. R. 4 Q. B. 736; Quartz Hill Gold Mining Company v. Eyre, 1883, 11 Q. B. D. 683 ; Mogul SS. Company v. M'Gregar, Gow & Company, 1888, 21 Q. B. D. 550; 23 Q. B. D. 598; [1892], A. C. 25; Allen v. Flood [1898], A. C. 55; Walters v. Green [1899], 2 Ch. 701.] S. C. 5 Mod. 394, 405. Salk. 13. Garth. 416. 12 Mod. 208. Holt, 8, 150, 193. 2 Vin. 25, pi. 42. Pleadings post, vol. 3, 264. An action lies for a malicious indictment which puts the party to expence though the charge it contains neither scandalizes him or endangers his personal security. Willielmus tertius, Dei gratia Angliae Scotiae Franciae et Hiberniae rex, fidei defenaor, &c. dilecto eb fideli suo Georgio Treby militi capitali justiciario suo de banco salutera. Quia in recordo et proceaau ac etiam in redditione judicii quae fuit in curia nostra coram vobis et sociis vestris justiciariis nostris de banco inter Jacobum Roberts et Willielmum Savile nuper de Mexbrough in cotnitatu, &c. armigerum de quadam transgressione super casum eidem Jacobo per praefatum Willelmum illata, ut dicitur, error iotervenit manifestus ad grave damnum ipsius Willelmi, sicut ex querela sua accepimus; nos errorem, si quis fuerit, modo debito corrigi, et partibus praedictis plenam et celerem justitiam fieri, volentes in hac parte, vobis mandamus, quod si judicium inde redditum sit, tune recordum et proceasum praedicta cum omnibus ea tangentibus nobia sub sigillo vestro diatinete et aperte mittatis et hoc breve, ita quod ea habeamus a die Paschae in quindecint dies, ubicunque tune fuerimus in Anglia, ut inspectis recordo et processu praedictis, ulterius inde pro errore illo corrigendo fieri faciamus, quod de jure et secundum legem et consuetudinem regni nostri Angliae fuerit faciendum. Teste meipso apud Weatmonasterium decimo sexto die Februarii anno regni nostri nono. hungerfoed. Responsio Georgii Treby militis capitalis justiciarii infra nominati. Recordum et processum loquelae uude infra fit mentio cum omnibus ea tangentibus coram domino rege ubicuuque, &c. ad diem infra contentum mitto in quodam recordo huic brevi annexe, prout interiua mihi praecipitur. geobge treby. Placita irrotulata apud Westmonasterium coram Georgio Treby milite et sociis suis justiciariia de banco de termino Sanctae Trinitatis anno regni domini Willelmi tertii Dei, gratia Angliae Scotiae Franciae et Hiberniae regis, fidei defensoria, &c. octavo. Rot. 1737. Eborum ss. Willelmus Savile nuper de Mexbrough in eomitatu praedicto armiger attachiatus fuit ad respondendum Jacobo Roberta de placito transgresaionis super casum, &c. Et unde idem Jacobus per Robertum Darwent attornatum suum queritur, quod praedictua Willelmus Savile, machinans et nequiter et malitiose intendens ipsum Jacobum minus rite praegravare ac [375] eum variis laboribus et expensia praetextus et colore justitiae et legis procressus defatigare opprimere et multipliciter damnificare, 1148 MICH. TERM, 10 WILL. 3 I ID. RAYM, 876. sine causa rationabili, ex malitia sua praecogitata apud Barnealey in coraitatu praedicto apud generalem quarterialem sessionem pacis dotnini regis tantam per adjourna-mentum ibidem pro se West Riding in eomibatu praadicto quitito decitno die Ootobris anno regni domini regis rmno septirao coratn Georgio Cooke baroiietto, Michaele Wentworth, Willelrao Lowther railitibus, Roberto Monkcon, Godfrido Boswile, Rich&rdo Nettletori, Johanna Bradshaw, Norms Parker armigeris, at aliis justiciariis dieti doraini regis ad pacem in le West Riding in dicto comitatu eonservandam nee non ad diversa felonias transgressiones et alia malefacta in le West Riding comitatus praedicti perpetrata audiendum et terminandutn assignatis, &c. ipsum Jacobura Roberts et quosdam Richardum Offerton generosiirn, Willelmum Shertcliffe, Thomam Middleton, Samuelera Roberts, Ellenham Roberts viduam, Thomam Roberts, Richardura Holden, Thomam Sheepshanke, Antonium Heiidley, Jouathanem Crosse, Georgiutn Sheepshanke, Antotiium Roberts, Benjatninum Nicholson, et uxorem ejus, Georgium Littlewood, Josephum Deil et Jonathanein White, per nomina Richardi Ort'erton nuper de Skirburgh in comitatu praedicto generosi, Willelmi Shertcliffe nuper de eadem laborer. Thomae Middleton nuper de Mexbrough in comitatu praedicto laborer, Sumuelis Roberts nuper de Beneby in comitatu pradicto laborer, praedicti Jacobi Roberts nuper de eadera laborer, Ellenae Roberts nuper de eadem viduae, Thomae Roberts nuper de eadem laborer, Jonathanis Crosse nuper de Skirburgh in comitatu praedicto laborer, Georgii Sheepshauke nuper de Beneby praedicto laborer, Anthonii Roberts nuper de eadem laborer, Benjamini Nicholson iiuper de eadem laborer, et uxoris ejus, Georgii Littlewood nuper de Skirburgh praedicta laborer, Josephi Dell nuper cle Beneby praedicta laborer et Jonathan! White nuper cle eadem laborer, de eo quod ipsi secundo die Octobris anno regni domini Willelmi tertii Dei gratia nunc regis Angliae, &o, septimo, vi et armis apud Beneby praedictam in le West Riding comitatus praedicti riotose routose illicite et injuste sese...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Berry v British Transport Commission
...special damage so as to bring her within the requirements in an action of this nature laid down by Chief Justice Sir John Holt in Savile v. Roberts, reported in 1 Lord Raymond, at page 374 and in numerous other reports. 9 It follows, therefore, that in my judgment the Statement of Claim is ......
- Crawford et Al v Financial Institutions Services Ltd (No. 2)
- Haji Ahmad v Sadah
-
DAVID O'KEEFFE v PATRICK WALSH, JOHN CONDON, and Others
...v. Clelland (4) decides that Order XVI. does not alter the previously settled law in Ireland. The plaintiff in Sadler v. The Great (1) 1 Lord Raym. 374. (4) [1899] 2 I. R. 486. (2) 23 Q. B. D. 598. (5) [1894] A. C. 500. (3) [1901] A. C. 495. VOL. II.] KING'S BENCH DIVISION. 693 Western Rail......