Schlumberger Holdings Ltd v Electromagnetic Geoservices as
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2009] EWHC 775 (Pat),[2009] EWHC 58 (Pat),[2008] EWHC 56 (Pat) |
| Date | 2008 |
| Court | Chancery Division (Patents Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
28 cases
-
Ng Min Hong v Soemarli Lie
...R. L et al v Putney Capital Management Ltd. BVIHCMAP2021/0027 (delivered 24th January 2022, unreported) followed; Schlumberger Holdings Ltd v Electromagnetic Geoservices AS [2008] EWHC 56 (Pat) considered; Lonrho Ltd v Shell Petroleum Co Ltd (No. 1) [1980] 1 WLR 627 considered; Ardila Inv......
-
NG Min Hong v Soemarli Lie
...R. L et al v Putney Capital Management Ltd. BVIHCMAP2021/0027 (delivered 24 th January 2022, unreported) followed; Schlumberger Holdings Ltd v Electromagnetic Geoservices AS [2008] EWHC 56 (Pat) considered; Lonrho Ltd v Shell Petroleum Co Ltd (No. 1) [1980] 1 WLR 627 considered; Ardila In......
- Schlumberger Holdings Ltd v Electromagnetic Geoservices as
-
Garmin (Europe) Ltd v Koninklijke Philips N.v (a company existing under the laws of the Kingdom of the Netherlands)
... ... ; it relied upon the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Schlumberger Holdings Ltd v Electromagnetic Geoservices AS [2010] RPC 33 ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Disclosure And Trust Documents - North Shore Ventures v Anstead Holdings
...the beneficiaries' control. The Court of Appeal found assistance from the case of Schlumberger Holdings v Electromagnetic Geoservices [2008] EWHC 56 (Pat) where a company had been ordered to provide documents that belonged to a third party because "that [company] enjoyed...the co-operation ......
-
High Court Finds 'Control' For The Purposes Of Disclosure Includes Third Party Documents That The Litigating Party Can Access Under A Standing Consent Short Of An Enforceable Right
...He referred to two cases that were relevant to this point. In the first, Schlumberger Holdings Ltd v Electromagnetic Geoservices AS [2008] EWHC 56 (Pat), the defendant argued that the claimant had control over the documents of other companies in its corporate group. The evidence showed that......