Scott v Scott

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CourtHouse of Lords
Judgment Date1913
Year1913
Date1913

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
757 cases
  • Chee Siok Chin and Another v Attorney General
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 13 Septiembre 2006
    ...either before or after the 1991 amendments. 33 The virtues of a public trial expressed in dicta relied upon by Mr Ravi from Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417 and Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] 1 AC 280 (“Harman”) are not counterpoints to the summary procedure debate. T......
  • R v Westminster City Council, ex parte Castelliand Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 31 Julio 1995
    ... ... R v Criminal Injuries Board, ex parte A [1992] COD 378 ... R v Socialist Worker, ex parte Attorney-General [1975] 1 QB 637 ... Scott v Scott [1918] AC 417 ... Applications for orders under s 11 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 ... Jan Luba for the applicants ... Simon Mehigan ... ...
  • Lee Boon Tuan v PP
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 Enero 1960
  • B. (orse. P.) v Attorney General
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Greenway v. Attorney-General (1927) 44 T.L.R. 124 applied ... Dictum of Earl Loreburn in Scott v. Scott [1913] A.C. 417, 446; 29 T.L.R. 520, H.L. doubted ... The petitioners in a legitimacy suit, two infants suing by their mother as next ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • Open And Shut Cases: Balancing Open Justice And Confidentiality
    • Cayman Islands
    • Mondaq Cayman Islands
    • 1 Marzo 2017
    ...analysis, though, will be similar in each case. "Publicity is the very soul of justice", as the House of Lords said in Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417 (a decision cited by the Chief Justice). However, the principle of publicity may need to cede to the overriding principle of doing justice in pa......
  • Justice On Display
    • Cayman Islands
    • Mondaq Cayman Islands
    • 24 Enero 2017
    ...their concerns and the basis for them. Footnotes For example, the so-called 'eraser button' law in California in 2013 [2011] (1) CILR 196 [1913] AC 417 [1992] Ch 394 [2004.2005] CILR 485 Re Beddoe [1893] 1 Ch 547 [2014] EWHC 3432 (Ch) Grand Court Rules Practice Direction No.3/97 [2014] (1) ......
20 books & journal articles
  • Subject Index
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 12-4, November 2008
    • 1 Noviembre 2008
    .... . . . . . . . . . . .154Savage andOwen v DPP[1982] ILRM 385 . . . . 220Schwartz vR [1988] 2SCR 443 . . . . . . . . .276, 294Scott vScott [1913]AC 417 . . . . . . . . . . . . 333–334Secretary of State for the Home Department vRehman [2003]1 AC 153 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 342Secretary......
  • Open Justice: Concepts and Judicial Approaches
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 40-3, September 2012
    • 1 Septiembre 2012
    ...some uncertainty within the Australian _____________________________________________________________________________________ 33 [1913] AC 417 (House of Lords). 34 Ibid 435. 35 Ibid 438. 36 Ibid 442. 37 Ibid 445–6. 38 Ibid 476. 39 Ibid 482–3. 394 Federal Law Review Volume 40 ________________......
  • Publication Bans
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Guide to the Law and Practice of Anti-SLAPP Proceedings Part IX. Procedural Issues in Anti-SLAPP Motions
    • 13 Junio 2022
    ...All ER 551, [2012] 3 WLR 1343, [2012] CP Rep 30, [2012] EMLR 22, [2012] WLR(D) 110, [2013] QB 618 • Scott & Anor v Scott , [1913] UKHL 2, [1913] AC 417 Australia • Hogan v Hinch , [2011] HCA 4 • McPherson v McPherson, [1936] AC 177 at para 200 • R v Hamilton (1930), 30 SR (NSW) 277 at para ......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Guide to the Law and Practice of Anti-SLAPP Proceedings Part IX. Procedural Issues in Anti-SLAPP Motions
    • 13 Junio 2022
    ...et al v Collette, 2021 ONSC 2138 ................................................ 96, 295–96, 395–96 Scott & Anor v Scott, [1913] UKHL 2, [1913] AC 417 .............................................462, 463, 466 Sean Brady v Keith Norman, [2008] EWHC 2481 (QB) .....................................
  • Get Started for Free