Scott v Scott

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CourtHouse of Lords
Judgment Date1913
Year1913
Date1913

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
855 cases
  • Chee Siok Chin and Another v Attorney General
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 13 September 2006
    ...either before or after the 1991 amendments. 33 The virtues of a public trial expressed in dicta relied upon by Mr Ravi from Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417 and Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] 1 AC 280 (“Harman”) are not counterpoints to the summary procedure debate. T......
  • R v Westminster City Council, ex parte Castelliand Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 31 July 1995
    ... ... R v Criminal Injuries Board, ex parte A [1992] COD 378 ... R v Socialist Worker, ex parte Attorney-General [1975] 1 QB 637 ... Scott v Scott [1918] AC 417 ... Applications for orders under s 11 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 ... Jan Luba for the applicants ... Simon Mehigan ... ...
  • Lee Boon Tuan v PP
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1960
  • B. (orse. P.) v Attorney General
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • Open And Shut Cases: Balancing Open Justice And Confidentiality
    • Cayman Islands
    • Mondaq Cayman Islands
    • 1 March 2017
    ...analysis, though, will be similar in each case. "Publicity is the very soul of justice", as the House of Lords said in Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417 (a decision cited by the Chief Justice). However, the principle of publicity may need to cede to the overriding principle of doing justice in pa......
  • Justice On Display
    • Cayman Islands
    • Mondaq Cayman Islands
    • 24 January 2017
    ...their concerns and the basis for them. Footnotes For example, the so-called 'eraser button' law in California in 2013 [2011] (1) CILR 196 [1913] AC 417 [1992] Ch 394 [2004.2005] CILR 485 Re Beddoe [1893] 1 Ch 547 [2014] EWHC 3432 (Ch) Grand Court Rules Practice Direction No.3/97 [2014] (1) ......
19 books & journal articles
  • Should Ireland prohibit the contemporaneous media reporting of juvenile trials?
    • Ireland
    • Irish Judicial Studies Journal No. 1-21, January 2021
    • 1 January 2021
    ...The Practical Operation of Article 34.1 of the Constitution —Part I’ (2003) 21(21) Irish Law Times, 303-308, 304. 128 Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417. 129 See Charles Lysaght, ‘Publicity of Court Proceedings’ (2003) 38(1) The Irish Jurist, 34-57. 130 Quoted by Lord Shaw in Scott v Scott [1912] ......
  • CONTEMPT ORDERS AND JUDICIAL “ATTACHMENT” OF EQUITABLE PROPERTY
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2017, December 2017
    • 1 December 2017
    ...2 SCR 612 at [106]. 67 See Benim v Whimster[1976] 1 QB 297. 68CfGompers v Bucks Stove & Range Co221 US 418 (1911) at 441. In Scott v Scott[1913] AC 417, the House of Lords clearly regarded the distinction between civil and criminal contempt as process-influenced. Counsel's submission that e......
  • Subject Index
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 12-4, November 2008
    • 1 November 2008
    .... . . . . . . . . . . .154Savage andOwen v DPP[1982] ILRM 385 . . . . 220Schwartz vR [1988] 2SCR 443 . . . . . . . . .276, 294Scott vScott [1913]AC 417 . . . . . . . . . . . . 333–334Secretary of State for the Home Department vRehman [2003]1 AC 153 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 342Secretary......
  • Open Justice: Concepts and Judicial Approaches
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 40-3, September 2012
    • 1 September 2012
    ...some uncertainty within the Australian _____________________________________________________________________________________ 33 [1913] AC 417 (House of Lords). 34 Ibid 435. 35 Ibid 438. 36 Ibid 442. 37 Ibid 445–6. 38 Ibid 476. 39 Ibid 482–3. 394 Federal Law Review Volume 40 ________________......
  • Get Started for Free