Seaconsar Far East Ltd v Bank Markazi Jomhouri Islami Iran
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judge | Lord Templeman,Lord Griffiths,Lord Goff of Chieveley,Lord Browne-Wilkinson,Lord Mustill |
| Judgment Date | 14 October 1993 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1993] UKHL J1014-1 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 14 October 1993 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
309 cases
-
Alliance Bank JSC v Aquanta Corporation and Others
...with a court considering the first of the three requirements laid down by Seaconsar Far East Ltd v Bank of Markazi Jomhouri Islami Iran [1994] 1 AC 438 is that in paragraph 71 of the judgment of Lord Collins in AK Investment CJFC v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd [2011] UKPC 7, namely that "the claima......
-
The Republic of Angola (2) (Acting by and Through the Ministry of Finance of Angola) v Perfectbit Ltd
...to counterclaim) out of the jurisdiction, the claimant (or counterclaimant) has to satisfy three requirements: Seaconsar Far East Ltd v Bank Markazi Jomhouri Islami Iran [1994] 1 AC 438, 453–457. First, the claimant must satisfy the court that in relation to the foreign defendant there is ......
- Bank of Baroda v Vysya Bank Ltd
-
Bancredit Cayman v Pellerano
... ... in the Dominican Republic-because the bank was a Cayman company, the applicable law on the ... (6) Seaconsar Far East Ltd. v. Bank Markazi Jomhouri Islami ... v. Bank Markazi Jomhouri Islami Iran (6). On behalf of Mr. Pellerano, it is said that ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
-
Choice of Law in Tort—Blending in with the Landscape of the Conflict of Laws?
...171 CLR 538, 568–569. It would, however, be desirable that the chosenplace be the same for jurisdictional and choice of law purposes.39 [1994] 1 AC 438.40 n 36 above.The Modern Law Review [Vol. 6138 The Modern Law Review Limited At common law it was established in Armagas Ltd vMundogas SA41......
-
RATIONALISING AND SIMPLIFYING THE PRESUMPTION OF SIMILARITY OF LAWS
...1 QB 391; [1989] 3 All ER 14 was not cited to the Court of Appeal. Only Seaconsar Far East Ltd v Bank Markazi Jomhouri Islami Iran[1994] 1 AC 438, a contract case, was. Relying on an analogy with the contract cases, the Court of Appeal held that the plaintiff was required to prove the exist......
-
Civil Procedure
...tried” as to whether the case came within r l(f)(i). The appellants relied on Seaconsar Far East Ltd v Bank Markazi Jomhouri Islami Iran[1994] 1 AC 438 which was a case under r l(e). However, the Court of Appeal, in disagreeing with the appellants, pointed out that there was no dispute in S......
-
Fog in the Gateway: Brownlie v Four Seasons Holdings Inc
...the English Courts’ (2015) 86 BYBIL 6.6 Civil Procedure Rules 1998, rule 6.36.7Seaconsar Far East Ltd vBank Markazi Jomhouri Islami Iran [1994] 1 AC 438 (HL) (Seaconsar).8 In tort claims, 3.1(9) reads: ‘A claim is made in tort where — (a) damage was sustained, or willbe sustained, within th......
Request a trial to view additional results