Seddon Properties Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 1981 |
Date | 1981 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
205 cases
-
Waterstone Estates Ltd v The Welsh Ministers
...so that it is not necessary to rehearse every argument but only the “principal important controversial issues” (see Seddon Properties v Secretary of State for the Environment (1981) 42 P&CR 26 at page 28 per Forbes J, and Bloor Homes at [19(1)]). The decision letter must give intelligible ......
-
The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea v The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (First Defendant) Charles Noell (Second Defendant)
...not need to "rehearse every argument relating to each matter in every paragraph" (see the judgment of Forbes J. in Seddon Properties v Secretary of State for the Environment (1981) 42 P. & C.R. 26, at p.28). (2) The reasons for an appeal decision must be intelligible and adequate, enabling......
-
The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea v The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (First Defendant) Aref Lahham (Second Defendant)
...not need to "rehearse every argument relating to each matter in every paragraph" (see the judgment of Forbes J. in Seddon Properties v Secretary of State for the Environment (1981) 42 P. & C.R. 26, at p.28). (2) The reasons for an appeal decision must be intelligible and adequate, enabling ......
-
Beverley Anne Guinness and Timothy Whitmore Newton Guinness v The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (First Defendant)
...procedures. The inspector must not depart from the principles of natural justice or procedural fairness ( Seddon Properties Ltd. v. Secretary of State for the Environment (1981) 42 P & CR 26 at pages 26–27). b) The decision letter must be read fairly, as a whole and in a straight-forward ma......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Appeals and Statutory Review of Planning Decisions
...relating to each matter in every paragraph’ (see judgment of Forbes J. in Seddon Properties v Secretary of State for the Environment (1981) 42 P&CR 26 at p.28). (2) The reasons for an appeal decision must be intelligible and adequate, enabling one to understand why the appeal was decided as......
-
Table of Cases
...the Regions v Baylis (Gloucester) Ltd, 14/7/2000, unreported, ChD 532 Seddon Properties Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment (1981) 42 P & CR 26, (1978) 248 EG 951, [1978] JPL 835, QBD 285 Seekings v Clarke (1961) 59 LGR 268, (1961) 105 SJ 181, DC 565 Sevenoaks District Council v Ha......
-
Appeals and Review of Planning Decisions
...relating to each matter in every paragraph’ (see judgment of Forbes J. in Seddon Properties v Secretary of State for the Environment (1981) 42 P&CR 26 at p.28). (2) The reasons for an appeal decision must be intelligible and adequate, enabling one to understand why the appeal was decided as......