Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Cradock (No. 3)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Chancery Division |
| Judgment Date | 1968 |
| Year | 1968 |
| Date | 1968 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
314 cases
-
Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan Kok Ming
... ... , even though the third party had received no trust property and irrespective of whether the ... 700 ... D.P.C. Estates Pty. Ltd. v. Grey and Consul Development Pty ... 550 ... Karak Rubber Co. Ltd. v. Burden (No. 2) [ 1972 ] 1 W.L.R ... 689 , C.A ... Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd. v. Cradock (No. 3) [ ... ...
-
Lipkin Gorman (A Firm)(Appellants(Plaintiffs) v (1) Karpnale Ltd (formerly Playboy Club of London Ltd) (Respondent (2) Lloyds Bank Plc (Respondent(Defendant)
...first instance two learned judges went appreciably further. These two decisions were Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd. v. Craddock [1968] 1 W.L.R.1555 and Karak Rubber Co. v. Burden [1972] 1 W.L.R.602. The facts of each case were complicated and it is unnecessary to set them out in detail......
- Lipkin Gorman (A Firm) v Karpnale Ltd
- Competitive Insurance Company Ltd v Davies Investments Ltd
Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
-
The UK Supreme Court's Judgment In Philipp V Barclays: Key Takeaways For Financial Institutions Executing Customer Payments
...care in and about executing that order on the other. The Supreme Court referred to Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Cradock (No 3) [1968] 1 WLR 1555, decided prior to Quincecare. In Selangor, the High Court concluded that the bank's duty to use reasonable skill and care "applies to inte......
-
The Supreme Court's Judgment In Philipp V Barclays: Key Takeaways For Financial Institutions Executing Customer Payments
...care in and about executing that order on the other. The Supreme Court referred to Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Cradock (No 3) [1968] 1 WLR 1555, decided prior to Quincecare. In Selangor, the High Court concluded that the bank's duty to use reasonable skill and care "applies to inte......
-
Trustee/Executor De Son Tort: Recognizing And Avoiding The Traps Of Unintended Fiduciary Obligations
...Company Ltd. v. Salaam (2002), [2003] 2 A.C. 366 at para. 138 (Eng. H.L.). 6 See e.g. Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd. v. Cradock, [1968] 2 All E.R. 1073 at 1095 (Eng. Ch. 7 [2013] O.J. No. 3659, (2013), D.L.R. (4th) 151, 90 E.T.R. (3d) 161 (C.A.) ("Chambers"). 8 R.S.O. 1990, c. E.21, s.......
12 books & journal articles
-
'The receipt of what?': Questions concerning third party recipient liability in equity and unjust enrichment.
...(59) See, eg, Lee v Sankey (1873) LR 15 Eq 204, 211 (Bacon V-C). (60) See, eg, Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Cradock [No 3] [1968] 2 All ER 1073; Consul (1975) 132 CLR 373. This was despite the fact that the rules had developed in the context of proprietary claims concerning land; an......
-
UNAUTHORISED FIDUCIARY GAINS AND THE CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST
...92 Including those cited by the High Court: Barnes v Addy(1874) LR 9 Ch App 224; Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Cradock (No 3)[1968] 1 WLR 1555; Karak Rubber Co Ltd v Burden (No 2)[1972] 1 WLR 602; Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Herbert Smith & Co (No 2)[1969] 2 Ch 276. 93 See Charles Mitchell......
-
Table of Cases
...214, 6 BCLR (3d) 97 (SC) ....................................... 325 Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Cradock (A Bankrupt) (No 3), [1968] 2 All ER 1073, [1968] 1 WLR 1555, [1968] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 289, 112 Sol J 744 (Ch) ............................................................................
-
VITIATING FACTORS IN CONTRACT LAW — THE INTERACTION OF THEORY AND PRACTICE
...1 AC 340 (in the context of the law of trusts; reference may also be made to Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Cradock (No 3)[1968] 1 WLR 1555). 450 See generally Phang, supra, note 364 at 66—71. And cf the rejection of the “public conscience test” in Tinsley v Milligan[1994] 1 AC 340. 4......
Get Started for Free