Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Cradock (No. 3)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Chancery Division |
| Judgment Date | 1968 |
| Year | 1968 |
| Date | 1968 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
267 cases
-
Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan Kok Ming
... ... , even though the third party had received no trust property and irrespective of whether the ... 700 ... D.P.C. Estates Pty. Ltd. v. Grey and Consul Development Pty ... 550 ... Karak Rubber Co. Ltd. v. Burden (No. 2) [ 1972 ] 1 W.L.R ... 689 , C.A ... Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd. v. Cradock (No. 3) [ ... ...
-
Lipkin Gorman (A Firm)(Appellants(Plaintiffs) v (1) Karpnale Ltd (formerly Playboy Club of London Ltd) (Respondent (2) Lloyds Bank Plc (Respondent(Defendant)
...first instance two learned judges went appreciably further. These two decisions were Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd. v. Craddock [1968] 1 W.L.R.1555 and Karak Rubber Co. v. Burden [1972] 1 W.L.R.602. The facts of each case were complicated and it is unnecessary to set them out in detail......
-
Barclays Bank Plc v Kenton Capital Ltd
... ... advanced in the Cayman Islands than in the United States, with the likely consequence that the cost ... had an action in personam against Kenton and no proprietary right in the money itself. However, ... Jo. 114. (5) Karak Rubber Co. Ltd. v. Burden (No. 2) , [1972] 1 W.L.R. 602 ... 451 , followed. (9) Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd. v. Cradock (No. 3) , ... ...
- Lipkin Gorman (A Firm) v Karpnale Ltd
Get Started for Free
3 firm's commentaries
-
The UK Supreme Court's Judgment In Philipp V Barclays: Key Takeaways For Financial Institutions Executing Customer Payments
...reasonable skill and care in and about executing that order on the other. The Supreme Court referred to Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Cradock (No 3) [1968] 1 WLR 1555, decided prior to Quincecare. In Selangor, the High Court concluded that the bank's duty to use reasonable skill and ......
-
The Supreme Court's Judgment In Philipp V Barclays: Key Takeaways For Financial Institutions Executing Customer Payments
...reasonable skill and care in and about executing that order on the other. The Supreme Court referred to Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Cradock (No 3) [1968] 1 WLR 1555, decided prior to Quincecare. In Selangor, the High Court concluded that the bank's duty to use reasonable skill and ......
-
Trustee/Executor De Son Tort: Recognizing And Avoiding The Traps Of Unintended Fiduciary Obligations
...Company Ltd. v. Salaam (2002), [2003] 2 A.C. 366 at para. 138 (Eng. H.L.). 6 See e.g. Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd. v. Cradock, [1968] 2 All E.R. 1073 at 1095 (Eng. Ch. 7 [2013] O.J. No. 3659, (2013), D.L.R. (4th) 151, 90 E.T.R. (3d) 161 (C.A.) ("Chambers"). 8 R.S.O. 1990, c. E.21, s.......
10 books & journal articles
-
'The receipt of what?': Questions concerning third party recipient liability in equity and unjust enrichment.
...(59) See, eg, Lee v Sankey (1873) LR 15 Eq 204, 211 (Bacon V-C). (60) See, eg, Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Cradock [No 3] [1968] 2 All ER 1073; Consul (1975) 132 CLR 373. This was despite the fact that the rules had developed in the context of proprietary claims concerning land; an......
-
Table of Cases
...214, 6 BCLR (3d) 97 (SC) ....................................... 325 Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Cradock (A Bankrupt) (No 3), [1968] 2 All ER 1073, [1968] 1 WLR 1555, [1968] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 289, 112 Sol J 744 (Ch) ............................................................................
-
The Regulation of Shadow Directors
...Sdn Bhd v Tan[1995] 2 AC 378 (PC); Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley[2002] 2 AC164; Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Craddock (No 3) [1968] 1 WLR 1555; the Ultraframe casesupra note 11 in pars 1476-7.67Barnes v Addy (1873-74) LR 9 Ch App 244; El Ajou v Dollar Land Holdings Plc [1994] BCC 143at 1......
-
EQUITABLE REMEDIES: PROTECTING "WHAT WE HAVE COMING TO US".
...determined by community standards, i.e., the prevailing common sense of the time. Selangor United Rubber Ests. Ltd. v. Cradock (No. 3) [1968] 2 All ER 1073, 1105 (Eng.) (Ungoed-Thomas, J.) (quoting Bodenham v. Hoskyns (1852) 21 L.J. Ch. 864, 873 (Eng.)) ("They are to be understood 'accordin......
Get Started for Free
