Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Cradock (No. 3)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1968 |
| Date | 1968 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
303 cases
-
Lipkin Gorman (A Firm)(Appellants(Plaintiffs) v (1) Karpnale Ltd (formerly Playboy Club of London Ltd) (Respondent (2) Lloyds Bank Plc (Respondent(Defendant)
...first instance two learned judges went appreciably further. These two decisions were Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd. v. Craddock [1968] 1 W.L.R.1555 and Karak Rubber Co. v. Burden [1972] 1 W.L.R.602. The facts of each case were complicated and it is unnecessary to set them out in detail......
-
Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan Kok Ming
......, even though the third party had received no trust property and irrespective of whether the ... [ 1992 ] 4 All E.R. 700 . D.P.C. Estates Pty. Ltd. v. Grey and Consul Development Pty. ... 550 . Karak Rubber Co. Ltd. v. Burden (No. 2) [ 1972 ] 1 W.L.R. ... 689 , C.A. . Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd. v. Cradock (No. 3) [ ......
- Lipkin Gorman (A Firm) v Karpnale Ltd
-
Yogambikai Nagarajah v Indian Overseas Bank
...... Barclays Bank plc, Ickenham Branch, Middx, United Kingdom. . . . . Our ... nor has it been signed by myself; I have had no knowledge of this letter whatsoever until receipt ... examined in some detail in the case of Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Cradock (No 3) ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Trustee/Executor De Son Tort: Recognizing And Avoiding The Traps Of Unintended Fiduciary Obligations
...Company Ltd. v. Salaam (2002), [2003] 2 A.C. 366 at para. 138 (Eng. H.L.). 6 See e.g. Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd. v. Cradock, [1968] 2 All E.R. 1073 at 1095 (Eng. Ch. 7 [2013] O.J. No. 3659, (2013), D.L.R. (4th) 151, 90 E.T.R. (3d) 161 (C.A.) ("Chambers"). 8 R.S.O. 1990, c. E.21, s.......
23 books & journal articles
-
'The receipt of what?': Questions concerning third party recipient liability in equity and unjust enrichment.
...(59) See, eg, Lee v Sankey (1873) LR 15 Eq 204, 211 (Bacon V-C). (60) See, eg, Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Cradock [No 3] [1968] 2 All ER 1073; Consul (1975) 132 CLR 373. This was despite the fact that the rules had developed in the context of proprietary claims concerning land; an......
-
UNAUTHORISED FIDUCIARY GAINS AND THE CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST
...92 Including those cited by the High Court: Barnes v Addy(1874) LR 9 Ch App 224; Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Cradock (No 3)[1968] 1 WLR 1555; Karak Rubber Co Ltd v Burden (No 2)[1972] 1 WLR 602; Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Herbert Smith & Co (No 2)[1969] 2 Ch 276. 93 See Charles Mitchell......
-
Table of cases
...278 Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd. v. Cradock (No. 3), [1968] 2 All E.R. 1073 (Ch. D.) ........................................................... 228, 269 Table of Cases 487 Semac Industries Ltd. v. 1131426 Ontario Ltd. (c.o.b. Bancroft Lumber & Wood Flooring Products), [2001] O.T.C. ......
-
Table of Cases
...214, 6 BCLR (3d) 97 (SC) ....................................... 325 Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Cradock (A Bankrupt) (No 3), [1968] 2 All ER 1073, [1968] 1 WLR 1555, [1968] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 289, 112 Sol J 744 (Ch) ............................................................................
Request a trial to view additional results