Senat v Senat

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1965
Year1965
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
21 cases
  • R v Britton
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 9 March 1987
    ...to, and the jury may also see those entries if they wish to do so." 14 More recently Sir Jocelyn Simon, President, in the case of Senat v. Senat (1965) P.172 at page 177 observed as follows: "[Counsel] says that where a document is inspected by opposing counsel in the conduct of the suit, i......
  • Leopardstown Club Ltd v Templeville Developments Ltd
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 29 January 2010
    ...2 IR 459, AG v Kyle [1933] IR 15 applied - Thomas v Jones [1921] KB 22 followed - Gregory v Tavernor (1833) 6 Car & P 280, Senat v Senat [1965] P 172 and Owen v Edwards (1983) 77 Cr App R 191 considered - Snowden v Branson [1999] EWCA Civ 1777 [1999] All ER (D) 738 considered - The Queens C......
  • R. v. Hall (D.S.)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 10 October 2002
    ...21, 1997), p. 60:30 [para. 18]. Friedland, Martin L., Detention Before Trial: A Study of Cases Tried in the Toronto Magistrates' Courts (1965), pp. 172 [para. 57]; 175 [paras. 57, 58]; 186 [para. Ontario, Report of the Commission on Systemic Racism in the Ontario Criminal Justice System (19......
  • R. v. Hall (D.S.)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 10 October 2002
    ...21, 1997), p. 60:30 [para. 18]. Friedland, Martin L., Detention Before Trial: A Study of Cases Tried in the Toronto Magistrates' Courts (1965), pp. 172 [para. 57]; 175 [paras. 57, 58]; 186 [para. Ontario, Report of the Commission on Systemic Racism in the Ontario Criminal Justice System (19......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • The Colombo Conference and Communist Insurgency in South and South-East Asia
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Relations No. 4-1, April 1972
    • 1 April 1972
    ...for Security, London, Cambridge UniversityPress, 1967, p. 226. T. B. Millar, Australia’s Defence, Victoria, MelbourneUniversity Press, 1965, p. 172. 95was prepared to assume a more militant posture. It was fromCanberra that the initiative came for a military pact for SouthernAsia and the We......
  • Recent Judicial Decisions
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles No. 70-1, January 1997
    • 1 January 1997
    ...day, eg, the officer read his notes before leaving the police station or whilst on theway by public transport.In Senat v. Senat (1965) 2 All ER 505, it was held that where a document is used torefresh a witness's memory, cross-examining counsel may inspect that document in orderto check it ......