Seymour v Pickett
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1905 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Primeo Fund (in Official Liquidation) v Bank of Bermuda (Cayman) Ltd and HSBC Securities Services (Luxembourg) Sa
...referred to. (72)St. Vincent European General Partner Ltd. v. Robinson, [2018] EWHC 1230 (Comm), considered. (73)Seymour v. Pickett, [1905] 1 K.B. 715, referred to. (74)Shaker v. Al-Bedrawi, [2002] EWCA Civ 1452; [2003] Ch. 350; [2003] 2 W.L.R. 922; [2002] 4 All E.R. 835; [2003] 1 BCLC 157,......
-
Primeo Fund v Bank of Bermuda (Cayman) Ltd
...to the account made prior to 7 August 2002 or credits made to the account post 7 August 2002. In addition, Primeo submitted, citing Seymour v Pickett [1905] 1 KB 715, that where a plaintiff is owed two (or more) debts, and receives payment, the plaintiff is entitled to appropriate the paym......
-
Northampton Borough Council v Anthony Michael Cardoza
...assignment or allocation of something to a particular purpose. For authority as to the meaning of appropriation, Mr Zaman referred to Seymour v Pickett [1905] 1 KB 715 and the judgment of Vaughan-Williams LJ, at pp.723–4, citing from the speech of Lord Macnaghten in The Mecca [1897] AC 286......
-
Euro Pools Plc ((in Administration)) v Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance Plc
...that it was open to the claimant to appropriate monies received “ up to the very last moment.” ( Chitty on Contracts at [21 – 063]; Seymour v Pickett [1905] 1 KB 150 Counsel for the defendant submitted that appropriation is a doctrine which applies specifically to the payment of debts and ......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...(3d) 47, 2000 CanLII 22767 (S.C.J.) ................................................................... 411, 417 Seymour v. Pickett, [1905] 1 K.B. 715 (C.A.) ..................................................... 258 Shapera v. Toronto-Dominion Bank (1970), 17 D.L.R. (3d) 122, [1971] 1 W.W.R......
-
Bank Accounts
...meet a particular bill or cheque; 124 (ix) where interest is payable, in which case, appropriation is to the 114 Seymour v. Pickett , [1905] 1 K.B. 715 (C.A.); Thomson v. Stikeman (1913), 17 D.L.R. 205 (Ont. C.A.). 115 Devaynes v. Noble; Clayton’s Case (1816), 1 Mer. 572; 35 E.R. 781 (H.L.)......
-
Bank Accounts
...Slack (1958), 11 D.L.R. (2d) 737 (Ont. C.A.). 111 Cory Bros. & Co . v. The “Mecca , ” [1897] A.C. 286 (H.L.). 112 Seymour v. Pickett , [1905] 1 K.B. 715 (C.A.); Thomson v. Stikeman (1913), 17 D.L.R. 205 (Ont. C.A.). 113 Devaynes v. Noble; Clayton’s Case (1816), 1 Mer. 572; 35 E.R. 781 (H.L.......
-
The Maritime Claimant’s Right to Security: “The Suhaili 5201”1
...37 at 44 and 45. 34. See inter aliaCory Brothers and Co, Ltd. v. The Owners of the S.S. “Mecca”[1897] A.C. 286 and Seymour v. Pickett[1905] 1 K.B. 715. 35. Per Lord Macnaghten in Cory Brothers and Co. Ltd. v. The Owners of the S.S. “Mecca”[1897] A.C. 286 at 294, 36. See the view of Coomaras......