Sharp v Jackson
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1897 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 cases
- Sharp (Official Receiver) v Jackson and Others
- Fitzritson v Administrator-General
-
Re Cutts (A Bankrupt)ex parte Bognor ; Mutual Building Society v Trustee of T W Cutts
...Taylor,(supra), Sharp v. Jackson(supra) and the same case in this Court sub nom New Prance & Garrard's Trustee v. Hunting, 1897, 2 Queen's Bench Division, p. 19. 30In the present case, therefore, it was incumbent on the Trustee to establish either by direct evidence of the Bankrupt's inten......
-
Grieve v Douglas-Home
...6 Rex v. HailwoodELR, [1928] 2 K. B. 277, Avory J. at p. 281. 7 Reference was made to New, Prance & Garrard's Trustee v. HuntingELR, [1897] 2 Q. B. 19, Lord Esher M.R. at p. 27, and to the Bankruptcy Act, 1914 (4 and 5 Geo. V, cap. 59), sec. 1 Rex v. HailwoodELR, [1928] 2 K. B. 277, Avory J......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Clawbacks In Insolvency
...is a notoriously difficult undertaking. The commentary of Lord Justice Smith in New, Prace & Gerrard's Trustees v Hunting and Others [1897] 2 QB 19 is "I have always understood that to ascertain whether there has been a fraudulent preference, it is necessary to consider what the dominan......
-
Clawbacks In Insolvency - September 9 2019
...is a notoriously difficult undertaking. The commentary of Lord Justice Smith in New, Prace & Gerrard's Trustees v Hunting and Others [1897] 2 QB 19 is "I have always understood that to ascertain whether there has been a fraudulent preference, it is necessary to consider what the dominan......
1 books & journal articles
-
Equitable compensation for breach of trust: off Target.
...Re Goldsmid (1886) 18 QBD 295, 300-1 (Lord Esher MR), 302 (Lindley LJ); Trustee of the Property of New, Prance & Garrard v Hunting [1897] 2 QB 19, 27 (Lord Esher MR), 29 (Smith LJ), 31 (Chitty LJ), affd Sharp v Jackson [1899] AC 419, 446 (Earl of Halsbury (92) See Rehden v Wesley (1861)......