Sharp v Wakefield and Others
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 20 March 1891 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1891] UKHL J0320-2 |
| Court | House of Lords |
[1891] UKHL J0320-2
House of Lords
Sharp
and
Wakefield and Others.
1
After hearing Counsel as well on Friday the 30th day of January last, as Monday the 2nd, and Tuesday the 3rd days of February last, upon the Petition and Appeal of Susannah Sharp, of Staveley, in the County of Westmoreland, praying, That the matter of the Order set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely, an Order of Her Majesty's Court of Appeal, of the 15th of December 1888, might be reviewed before Her Majesty the Queen, in Her Court of Parliament, and that the said Order might be reversed, varied, or altered, or that the Petitioner might...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
182 cases
-
Ward v James
... ... These words were adopted by Lord Hal bury (Lord Chancellor) in Sharp v. Wakefield , (1891) Appeal Cases, at page 179 , Then Lord Mansfield went on to refuse bail to ... Some thought in hundreds of pounds, others in thousands. The result was chaos. No one know what to award. In the end the House of Lords ... ...
-
Jacques Scott & Company Ltd v Moxam
...Cases cited: (1) -Julius v. Oxford (Bishop)ELR(1880), 5 App. Cas. 214; [1874–80] All E.R. Rep. 43, applied. (2) -Sharp v. WakefieldELR, [1891] A.C. 173; sub nom. Sharpe v. Wakefield, [1886–90] All E.R. Rep. 651; (1891), 60 L.J.M.C. 73, distinguished. Legislation construed: Liquor Licensing ......
-
Smith v Police Commissioner
...[1964] A.C. 40; [1963] 2 All E.R. 66, followed. (58) Roncarelli v. DuplessisUNK(1959), 16 D.L.R. (2d) 689. (59) Sharp v. Wakefield, [1891] A.C. 173; [1886–90] All E.R. Rep. 651, dictum of Lord Halsbury, L.C. followed. (60) Smith v. R.ELR(1878), L.R. 3 App. Cas. 614, applied. (61) Spackman v......
-
Graham Thompson v Liquor Licensing Bd
...[1951] 2 K.B. 784; [1951] 2 All E.R. 656. (5) Ridge v. Baldwin, [1964] A.C. 40; [1963] 2 All E.R. 66, followed. (6) Sharp v. Wakefield, [1891] A.C. 173; [1886–90] All E.R. Rep. 651, dictum of Lord Bramwell applied. Liquor-licensing-Liquor Licensing Board-natural justice-applicant seeking ap......
Get Started for Free
13 books & journal articles
-
Tiptoeing through the Tripwires: Recent Developments in Jurisdictional Error
...Ibid 372 (Gageler J). 139 Singh (2014) 231 FCR 437, 444–5. 140 Li (2013) 24 9 CLR 332, 370–2. 141 Ibid 362–3, citing Sharp v Wakefield [1891] AC 173. 142 (1945) 69 CLR 613. 143 Li (2013) 24 9 CLR 332, 348–9. 144 Stretton Appeal (2016) 237 FCR 1, 3–4 [5]. 145 [2014] WASC 346 (26 September 20......
-
Cases referred to in 1989 Part II
...Shaibu v. Bakare (1984) 12 S.C. 187. ......................................................................... 517 Sharpe v. Wakefield (1891) A.C. 173. .......................................................................... 213 Sheldon v. Bromfield Justices (1964) 2 Q.B. 573 ..................
-
Purposivism, Textualism, and Originalism in Recent Cases on Charter Interpretation.
...originalist thought). (147.) Sharpe v Wakefield, [1888] 22 QBD 239 at 242, 37 WR 187 (CA) (Lord Escher MR), aff'd in Sharpe v Wakefield, [1891] AC 173, 39 WR (148.) See Perka v R, [1984] 2 SCR 232 at 264-65, 13 DLR (4th) 1; R v DLW, 2016 SCC 22 at para 20. (149.) See text accompanying note ......
-
Table of Cases
...Shahimi v. Akinola (1993) 5 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 294) 434...................................................……………391 Sharp v. Wakefield (1891) A.C. 173; (1888) 22 Q.B.D. 239; 58 L.J.M.C. 57; 60 L.T. 130…..196, 237 Sharples v. Barton (1951) 13 W.A.C.A. 198………………...........................................
Get Started for Free