Shaw v Sloan and Others
| Jurisdiction | Northern Ireland |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Northern Ireland) |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1982 |
| Date | 01 January 1982 |
Shaw
and
Sloan and Others
(C.A.)
Negligence -Actions founded on same acts - Second defendant not party to earlier proceedings but called as witness - Whether privity of interest between second and third defendants.
In June, 1978, a motor cycle owned and ridden by the first defendant collided with a car driven by the second defendant and owned by the third defendant. In January, 1979, the third defendant was successful in a county court action for damages against the first defendant for damage to his car. In an action by the plaintiff, who had been a pillion...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
29 cases
-
PJSC National Bank Trust v Boris Mints
...even though no issue estoppel has arisen. However, it is likely to be a rare case in which this is so. As Lord Lowry noted in Shaw v Sloan [1982] NI 393, 397: “The entire corpus of authority in issue estoppel is based on the theory that it is not an abuse of process to relitigate a point wh......
-
Reamsbottom v Raftery
...formulate his defence or call his own evidence. Donohuev. BrowneIR [1986] I.R. 90 followed. Dicta of O'Donnell L.J. in Shaw v. SloanDNI [1982] N.I. 393, 410, and Megarry V.C. in Gleeson v. J. Wippel & Co.WLR [1977] 1 W.L.R. 510, 516 approved. Reamsbottom v. Raftery Hazel Reamsbottom Plainti......
-
Lawless v Bus Éireann
...Citations: REAMSBOTTOM V RAFTERY 1991 1 IR 531 DONOHOE V BROWNE 1986 IR 90 BROWNELL V BUS EIREANN UNREP SMITH 18.12.90 SHAW V SLOAN 1982 NI 393 GLEESON V J WIPPELL & CO lTD 1977 1 WLR 510 Synopsis: ACTION Issues Estoppel - Vehicles - Collision - Damage - First action by passenger agains......
-
McGuinness v Motor Distributors Ltd
...LTD JAMES McGUINNESS PLAINTIFF AND MOTOR DISTRIBUTORS LIMITED AND TONY KELLY CAR SALESLIMITED DEFENDANTS Citations: SHAW V SLOAN 1982 NI 393 LAWLESS V BUS EIREANN 1994 1 IR 474 REAMSBOTTOM V RAFFERTY 1991 1 IR 531 MCSHANE V MCGINN UNREP KEANE 18.5.95 Synopsis: CONTRACT Breach of contract......
Get Started for Free