Sheffield District Railway v Great Central Railway
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1911 |
| Court | Railway and Canal Commission |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
39 cases
-
Ong Khim Heng Daniel v Leonie Court Pte Ltd
...permission, would have taken. The defendants submitted that the law is best stated in Sheffield Railway Co v Great District Railway Co [1911] 27 TLR 451, a decision referred to in the IBM UK case. In this case the defendant company undertook to use their best endeavours to develop the throu......
-
Jet2.com Ltd v Blackpool Airport Ltd
...effect of an obligation to use reasonable or best endeavours. The first was Sheffield District Railway Co. v Great Central Railway Co. (1911) 27 T.L.R. 451, a decision of the Rail and Canal Commissioners chaired by A.T. Lawrence J.. In that case the Sheffield District Railway ("the Sheffiel......
- Hospital Products Ltd v United States Surgical Corporation
- Australian Medic-Care Company Ltd v Hamilton Pharmaceutical Pty Ltd (Acn 008 204 635)
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
The Latest On Bonds And Guarantees
...qualifications, no stone should be left unturned in an attempt to comply (see Sheffield District Railway Co v Great Central Railway Co [1911] 27 TLR 451). 2 In the Simon Carves case, the parties had agreed expressly that the beneficiary's right to make a demand on the guarantee was either q......
-
Proving Your Claim And What Needs To Be Done Now
...2016 D&B clause 2.25.6.1. 2. For example see the JCT D&B 2016 clause 2.25.6.1. 3. Sheffield District Railway v Great Central Railway [1911] 27 TLR 451. 4. Pips (Leisure Ltd v Walton (1980) 43 P&CR 415. 5. Keating on Building Contracts, 6th edition (Sweet and Maxwell), p. 642. 6. Constructio......
3 books & journal articles
-
Is This Really the Best We Can Do? American Courts’ Irrational Efforts Clause Jurisprudence and How We Can Start to Fix It
...contract interpretation, as do English courts and courts in the common-law [sic] jurisdictions of Canada.” (footnotes omitted)). 178. (1911) 27 TLR 451, 452 (Rail. & Canal Com.) (Eng.). 179. [2000] All ER (D) 771 (Ch) (Eng.) (footnotes omitted); see also CPC Grp. Ltd. v. Qatari Diar Real Es......
-
Land Law
...namely, IBM United Kingdom Ltd v Rockware Glass Ltd[1980] FSR 335 at 345 and Sheffield District Railway Co v Great Central Railway Co(1911) 27 TLR 451 at 452, helpful in explaining what an undertaking to make best endeavours entailed. Given the practical considerations and the requirements ......
-
Case Note
...v Blackpool Airport Ltd[2012] EWCA Civ 417 at [32], per Moore-Bick LJ. 32 See Sheffield District Railway Co v Great Central Railway Co(1911) 27 TLR 451 and IBM United Kingdom Ltd v Rockware Glass Ltd[1980] FSR 335. 33KS Energy Services Ltd v BR Energy (M) Sdn Bhd[2014] 2 SLR 905 at [93]; se......