Sherras v De Rutzen
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Divisional Court |
| Date | 1895 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
116 cases
-
Public Prosecutor v Phua Keng Tong Public Prosecutor v Frederick Tan Im Kian Frederick Tan Im Kian v Public Prosecutor
...or by necessary implication by the language of the statute or by the subject matter with which the statute deals. In Sherras v De Rutzen [1895] 1 QB 918 Wright J said: There is a presumption that mens rea, an evil intention, or a knowledge of the wrongfulness of the act, is an essential ing......
- R; Seah Eng Joo
- R v George Barbar
- Mohamed Ibrahim v PP
Request a trial to view additional results
10 books & journal articles
-
Regulatory Offences and Reverse Burdens: The ‘Licensing Approach’
...has the effect ofdistorting the law. For example, the Divisional Court’s analysis of the offence inSheldrake considered above. 44 [1895] 1 QB 918 at 922.45 A distinction repeated in later cases when strict liability and the presumption mens rea was considered, notably Sweet v Parsley [1970]......
-
Strict Criminal Liability: A Violation of the Convention?
...vStorkwain Ltd [1986] 2 All ER 635, HL.17 R v Howells [1977] 3 All ER 417.18 Cundy v Le Cocq (1884) 13 QBD 207.19 Sherras vDe Rutzen [1895] 1 QB 918.20 R v Blake [1997] 1 All ER 963, CA.21 International Transport Roth GmbH and Others v Secretary of State for the HomeDepartment [2003] QB 728......
-
Court of Appeal
...against those whohave acted in a blameworthy fashion. The courts have periodicallyendorsed such a proposition: see Sherras v De Rutzen [1895] 1 QB 918;Sweet v Parsley [1970] AC 132; and, recently, B (A Minor) v DPP [2000]2 Cr App R 265, (2000) 64 JCL 388 and K[2001] UKHL 41, (2001) 65JCL 12......
-
Doing Justice to the Environment
...and do not act as a deterrent.3* Senior Lecturer in Law, University of Salford; e-mail: j.d.adshead@salford.ac.uk.1Sherras vDe Rutzen [1895] 1 QB 918 at 922; A. P. Simester, G. R. Sullivan,J. R. Spencer and G. Virgo, Simester and Sullivan’s Criminal Law: Theory and Doctrine,4th edn (Hart: O......
Request a trial to view additional results