Shocked v Goldschmidt
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
| Year | 1998 |
| Date | 1998 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
96 cases
- Demag (M) Sdn Bhd v Greenlinx Sdn Bhd
-
Su Sh-Hsyu v Wee Yue Chew
... ... This general categorisation is recognised by the English courts, for example, in Shocked v Goldschmidt [1998] 1 All ER 372 (“ Shocked ”) at 377 and the local courts, for example, in Vallipuram Gireesa Venkit Eswaran v Scanply ... ...
- Nguyen v Pascoe
-
Onyenmezu v Firstcare Ireland Ltd
...on 12th September, 2019. Held by Humphreys J that, as Leggatt LJ for the English Court of Appeal emphasised in Shocked v Goldschmidt [1998] 1 All E.R. 372, there is a significant difference between a tactical decision not to attend court compared with failure to attend that is down to mere ......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Civil Procedure
...reason for the party”s absence, other considerations are also relevant. Referring to the Leggatt LJ”s judgment in Shocked v Goldschmidt[1998] 1 All ER 372, the other relevant factors are (Su Sh-Hsyu v Wee Yue Chew at [44]): (a) whether the successful party would be irremediably prejudiced b......