Shuttleworth v Cox Brothers & Company (Maidenhead) Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1927 |
| Year | 1927 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
63 cases
- Chi Liung & Son Ltd, Re; Tong Chong Fah v Tong Lee Hwa and Others
-
[1] Staray Capital Ltd [2] Marlon Ray Chen Appellants v Cha, Yang (also known as Stanley) Respondent [ECSC]
...and another [2007] UKPC 13 applied; Allen v Gold Reefs of West Africa, Limited [1900] 1 Ch 656 applied; Shuttleworth v Cox Brothers and Company (Maidenhead), Limited, and Others [1927] 2 KB 9 applied. 2. The learned judge's finding that Mr. Chen did not rely on the representations made by......
-
McAteer v. Devoncroft Developments Ltd.,
...Ltd. (No. 1) (1976), 1 B.C.L.R. 36 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 398, footnote 29]. Shuttleworth v. Cox Brothers and Co. (Maidenhead), [1926] All E.R. Rep. 498 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 400]. Westfair Foods Ltd. v. Watt et al. (1990), 106 A.R. 40 (Q.B.), revd. (1992), 131 A.R. 142; 25 W.A.C. 142; 4......
- Petra Perdana Berhad v Tengku Dato' Ibrahim Petra Tengku Indra Petra
Request a trial to view additional results
10 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...Shevill v Press Alliance SA [1996] AC 959, [1996] 3 WLR 420, [1996] 3 All ER 929, HL 62 Shuttleworth v Cox Brothers & Co (Maidenhead) Ltd [1927] 2 KB 9, 96 LJKB 104, 136 LT 337, 43 TLR 83 135 Skinner v Oklahoma, 316 US 535, 62 S Ct 1110, 86 L Ed 1655 (1942) 387, 388 Smith and Snipes Hall Fa......
-
An analysis of directors' fiduciary duties in the removal of a director from office
...and For estry v Stilfon tein Gold Mining Co Ltd 2 006 5 SA 333 (W) para 16 617 Shuttle worth v Cox Brothers & C o (Maidenhead) Lt d 1927 2 KB 9; Re Smith & Fawc ett Ltd 1942 Ch 304, 306; Hogg v Cramph orn Ltd 1967 Ch 254; Regentcr est plc (in liquidati on) v Cohen 2001 2 BCLC 80 105; Extras......
-
Bibliografie
...AC 324;[1958] 3 All ER 66Sidebottom v Kershaw Leese and Company Limited [1920] 1 Ch154 (CA)Shuttleworth v Cox Bros & Co (Maidenhead) Ltd [1927] 2 KB 9(CA)Smith v Croft (No 1) (1986) 2 BCC 99,010Smith v Croft (No 2) [1987] BCLC 206; [1988] Ch 114; [1987] 3 AllER 909Smith v Croft (No 3) (1987......
-
Begripstoeligting. Hoofstuk 2
...v Welkom Theatres(Pty) Ltd 1954 3 SA 339 (O) 351.50 Sien bv Burland v Earle [1902] AC 83; Shuttleworth v Cox Bros & Co(Maidenhead) Ltd [1927] 2 KB 9 (CA) 23; Fairham v Cape Town MutualAid Fund 1949 1 SA 919 (K); Levin v Feld and Tweeds Ltd 1951 2 SA401 (A) 414-415; Tolley’s company law (red......
Request a trial to view additional results