Sim v Robinow
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Date | 1892 |
| Year | 1892 |
| Court | Court of Session (Inner House - First Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
36 cases
- Loke Yu; Malacca Securities Sdn Bhd
-
Spiliada Maritime Corporation v Cansulex Ltd
...law and Scots law may now be regarded as indistinguishable. It is proper therefore to regard the classic statement of Lord Kinnear in Sim v. Robinow 1892 19 R. 665 as expressing the principle now applicable in both jurisdictions. He said, at p. 668: "… the plea can never be sustained unless......
-
Spiliada Maritime Corporation v Cansulex Ltd
...law and Scots law may now be regarded as indistinguishable. It is proper therefore to regard the classic statement of Lord Kinnear in Sim v. Robinow 1892 19 R. 665 as expressing the principle now applicable in both jurisdictions. He said, at p. 668: "… the plea can never be sustained unless......
-
JH Rayner (Mincing Lane) Ltd v Teck Hock & Co (Pte) Ltd and Others
......Relying on r 4(2) and invoking the plea of forum non conveniens, Mr Yap submitted that Singapore is not the appropriate forum in so far as the third defendant is concerned.In Sim v Robinow (1892) 19 R (Court of Session) 665 at p 668, Lord Kinnear had this to say on the plea of forum non conveniens: . . .. the plea can never be sustained unless the court is satisfied that there is some other tribunal, having competent jurisdiction, in which the case may be tried more ......
Request a trial to view additional results