Singer Company (U.K.) Ltd v Tees and Hartlepool Port Authority
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court) |
| Year | 1988 |
| Date | 1988 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
24 cases
- Phua Siong Hoe v RHB Bank Bhd; Persatuan Pemilik Tanah Taman Pandan
-
The Pioneer Container (K.H. Enterprise)
... ... bills of lading which gave the carriers authority to sub-contract the whole or part of the carriage ... 1015 , P.C ... Singer Co. (U.K) Ltd. v. Tees and Hartlepool Port ... Container Lines (“Hanjin”), a Korean company, in respect of the carriage of the goods from the ... ...
-
Goodlife Foods Ltd v Hall Fire Protection Ltd
... ... I am told that there is no authority on the point. Hall Fire submits that the ... Hall Fire was a company of a similar size, with an annual turnover (for ... the decision of the Court of Appeal in Regus (UK) Ltd v Epcot Solutions Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 361 ... , it is by no means a decisive factor: see Singer v Tees [1988] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 164 at p. 170 and ... ...
-
Homburg Houtimport BV v Agrosin Private Ltd (Starsin)
...of the court. Furthermore, on this point Lord Denning M.R.'s statement of the law was applied by Steyn J. in Singer Co. (UK) Ltd. v. Tees and Hartlepool Port Authority [1988] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 164. It was not, however, followed by Donaldson J. in Johnson Matthey & Co. Ltd v Constantine Termina......
Get Started for Free
