Singer Company (U.K.) Ltd v Tees and Hartlepool Port Authority

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1988
Year1988
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
28 cases
  • Ship Starsin, Re, (2003) 307 N.R. 100 (HL)
    • Canada
    • 13 March 2003
    ...Denning, M.R.'s, statement of the law was applied by Steyn, J., in Singer Co. (UK) Ltd. v. Tees and Hartlepool Port Authority , [1988] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 164. It was not, however, followed by Donaldson, J., in Johnson Matthey & Co. Ltd. v. Constantine Terminals Ltd. , [1976] 2 Lloyd's Rep. ......
  • Phua Siong Hoe v RHB Bank Bhd; Persatuan Pemilik Tanah Taman Pandan
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2001
  • Sandeman Coprimar SA v Transitos y Transportes Integrales SL
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 February 2003
    ...containing those conditions, but not otherwise. 54 This doctrine was approved and applied by Steyn J. in Singer Co. (UK) Ltd v Tees and Hartlepool Port Authority [1988] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 164. It also received approval by members of the Court of Appeal in The Kapetan Marcos NL (No 2) [1987] 2 ......
  • Goodlife Foods Ltd v Hall Fire Protection Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 7 April 2017
    ...case: "(8) While the availability of insurance to the supplier is relevant, it is by no means a decisive factor: see Singer v Tees [1988] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 164 at p. 170 and Flamar Interocean Ltd v Denmac Ltd ('The Flamar Pride') [1990] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 434 at p. 439. (9) The presence of a term ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT