Sirdar Gurdyal Singh v Rajah of Faridkote
Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
Judgment Date | 1894 |
Date | 1894 |
Year | 1894 |
Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
69 cases
-
United Malayan Banking Corp v Khoo Boo Hor
...was no implied submission or agreement to submit to the jurisdiction of the original court.In Sirdar Gurdyal Singh v Rajah of Faridkote [1894] AC 670, at p 686, the Privy Council expressed the view that contractual submission to the jurisdiction of a foreign court `unless expressed, could n......
-
Doran v Minister for Finance
...V E COMMES HOOLDING LTD 1998 IRLR 263 HILL & STAPLETONV REVENUE COMMISSIONERS 1998 IRLR 466 SEYMOUR-SMYTH 1999 IRLR 253 SIRDAR V FARIKDATE 1894 AC 670 TREATY OF ROME ART 177 ANTI-DISCRIMINATION (PAY) ACT 1974 S8(3) BRIDES V MIN FOR AGRICULTURE 1998 4 IR 250 ANTI-DISCRIMINATION (PAY) ACT 19......
-
Flightlease (Ireland) Ltd (in voluntary liquidation)
...in the principle of territoriality as interpreted and applied by the English courts in the nineteenth century; see Rajah of Faridkote [1894] A.C. 670. This principle reflects the fact, one of the basic tenets of international law, that sovereign states have exclusive jurisdiction in their o......
-
New Hampshire Insurance Company v Strabag Bau Aktiengesellschaft
...that a choice of jurisdiction, to be effective, must be express. It will not be implied. This has been the law since Sirdar Gurdyal Singh v. The Rajah of Faridkote [1894] A.C. 670. In that case the Privy Council said, with regard to Blackburn J.'s judgment in Schibsby v. Westenholz L.R. 6 ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
The Fundamentals Of A Civil Asset Recovery Action - Part 1
...the conflict of laws. "All jurisdiction is properly territorial," declared Lord Selborne [in Sirdar Gurdyal Singh v. Rajah of Faridkote [1894] A.C. 670, 683-684 (P.C.)], extra territorium jus dicenti, impune non paretur...In a personal action, ...a decree in absentem by a foreign court, to ......
7 books & journal articles
-
PROBLEMS IN THE RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF US CLASS ACTION JUDGMENTS IN SINGAPORE
...28 See Emanuel v Symon[1908] 1 KB 302 at 309; Schibsby v Westenholz(1870) LR 6 QB 155 at 161; Sirdar Gurdyal Singh v Rajah of Faridkote[1894] AC 670 at 683–684; and RMS Veerappa Chitty v MPL Mootappa Chitty(1894) 2 SSLR 12. 29Emanuel v Symon[1908] 1 KB 302 at 309; WSG Nimbus Pte Ltd v Board......
-
The Recognition, and Res Judicata Effect, of a United States Class Actions Judgment in England: A Rebuttal of V
ivendi
...the foreign jurisdiction, via contractualprovision. See,eg, Nygh and Davies, n 105 above, 175–176, citing, eg, Singh vRajah of Faridkote[1894] AC670 (PC) 686, and Vogel vRA Kohnstamm Ltd [1973] 1 QB 133;and D&M, n 20 above,600. Cf Br iggs, The Conflict of Laws, n 78 above,141 (any implied ag......
-
International Jurisdiction in Claims Sounding in Money: Is Richman v Ben-Tovim the Last Word?
...which permitted the service of66[1916] 2 AC 298 (HL) at 302. See also the earlier case of Sirdar Gurdyal Singh v The Rajah ofFaridkote [1894] AC 670 (PC).67As in Maharanee Seethadevi Gaekwar of Baroda v Wildenstein [1972] 2 QB (CA) 285 where anIndian princess residing in France brought an a......
-
Yaiguaje v. Chevron corporation: testing the limits of natural justice and the recognition of foreign judgments in Canada.
...6 O.R. 206 (High Ct.). (134.) [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1077. For a discussion of English common law, see, e.g., Singh v. Rajah of Faridkote, [1894] A.C. 670 (P.C.); Emanuel v. Symon, [1908] 1K.B. 302 (135.) The judgment in question was issued by an Alberta court and sought to be enforced in British ......
Request a trial to view additional results