Skuse v Granada Television Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
| Year | 1996 |
| Date | 1996 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
214 cases
-
O'Rawe (Brigid) and William Trimble Ltd
... ... [22] In March 2004 Ulster Television broadcast a programme “The Issue” in which the mother of Lucy Crawford spoke, amongst other ... to my task has been governed by the summary of principles given by Sir Thomas Bingham in Skuse v Granada (1996) EMLR 278 at 285-287: “(1) The courts have give to the material complained of ... ...
-
Ecclestone v Telegraph Media Group Ltd
...meaning do not 'admit of elaborate analysis'; and to the guidance given by Sir Thomas Bingham MR in Skuse v Granada Television Limited [1996] EMLR 278 at 285–7 as to the approach to be adopted when the court is called upon to determine the actual meaning of the words: i) The court should gi......
-
Robin Cammish v Clive Hughes
...He urges us to be slow to interfere with the assessment of the trial judge, citing Sir Thomas Bingham MR in Skuse v Granada Television [1996] EMLR 278 at 286: "The Court of Appeal should be slow to differ from any conclusion of fact reached by a trial judge. Plainly this principle is less c......
-
Bernard (Jasper) v Jamaica Observer
...relation to determining the meaning of the impugned words were not in doubt, and referred to the principles enunciated in Skuse v Granada Television Ltd. 1996 EMLR 278, where Sir Thomas Bingham M.R. at page 285 said; "In short, the court should give the article the natural and ordinary mean......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
REPUTATION AND DEFAMATORY MEANING ON THE INTERNET
...Island Country Club [2010] 4 SLR 288; Segar Ashok v Koh Fonn Lynn Veronica[2010] SGHC 168. See also Skuse v Granada Television Ltd[1996] EMLR 278 at 286 that: … [a] statement should be taken to be defamatory if it would tend to lower the plaintiff in the estimation of right-thinking members......
