Sleigh v Tyser
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 22 May 1900 |
| Date | 22 May 1900 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
-
The “Asia Star”
...Jenkinson & Co Ltd v Percy Dalton (London) Ltd [1957] 2 QB 633 (refd) Ford v Beech (1848) 11 QBD 852; 116 ER 693 (folld) Sleigh v Tyser [1900] 2 QB 333 (folld) Sunlight Mercantile Pte Ltd v Ever Lucky Shipping Co Ltd [2004] 1 SLR (R) 171; [2004] 1 SLR 171 (folld) Virginia Carolina Chemical ......
-
Sunlight Mercantile Pte Ltd and Another v Ever Lucky Shipping Co Ltd
...of the vessel at the commencement of the voyage must be “express, pertinent and apposite” (per Bigham J in Sleigh v Tyser [1900] 2 QB 333, 337). Innumerable cases have shown how difficult it is to frame an exception that would be applicable in cases of unseaworthiness. In Steel v State Line......
-
Onego Shipping & Chartering BV v JSC Arcadia Shipping (The "Socol 3")
...principles would apply to whether it covers a breach of the “fundamental” or “overriding” duty of seaworthiness. As Bigham J said in Sleigh v Tyser [1900] 2 QB at 337–338: “To exclude the implied warranty of seaworthiness the words used must be express, pertinent and apposite.”– see also Th......
- SUNLIGHT MERCANTILE PTE. Ltd and another v EVER LUCKY SHIPPING COMPANY Ltd
Request a trial to view additional results