Smith, Stone and Knight Ltd v Birmingham Corporation
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1939 |
| Date | 1939 |
| Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
105 cases
-
Maclaine Watson & Company Ltd v International Tin Council
...... because the members are not parties to the corporation's contracts. The member states are not liable for the debts ......
-
The State (Mcinerney Company Ltd) v Dublin County Council
......: ABENGLEN PROPERTIES LTD, STATE V DUBLIN CORPORATION 1984 IR 381 , 1982 ILRM 590 CREEDON V DUBLIN ... GOVT (PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT) ACT 1976 S14(5) SMITH STONE & KNIGHT LTD V BIRMINGHAM CORPO 1939 4 AER 116 ......
-
Fyffes Plc v DCC Plc
...views of the human agents of the companies were not in any way determinative of the issue. Smith, Stone & Knight v. Birmingham Corpn.[1939] 4 All E.R. 116, Nedco Ltd. v. Clark(1973) 43 D.L.R. (3d) 714, D.H.N. Ltd. v. Tower Hamlets [1976] 1 W.L.R. 852 and Munton Bros. Ltd. v. Secretary of St......
- Hotel Jaya Puri Bhd v National Union of Hotel, Bar & Restaurant Workers and Another
Request a trial to view additional results
13 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...[2005] All ER (D) 200 (Oct) 164 Smith v Jeyes (1841) 4 Beav 503, 49 ER 433, Rolls Ct 150 Smith, Stone & Knight Ltd v Birmingham Corpn [1939] 4 All ER 116, 37 LGR 665, 104 JP 31, KBD 47 Snow v Milford (1868) 18 LT 142, 16 WR 554 116 Table of Cases xxiii Sobell v Boston [1975] 1 WLR 1587, [19......
-
Table of Cases
...495, 6 C.C.L.T. 41 (C.A.) ..............................................34, 108 Smith, Stone and Knight, Ltd. v. Birmingham Corp., [1939] 4 All E.R. 116 ...... 282 Snell v. Farrell, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 311, [1990] S.C.J. No. 73, 72 D.L.R. (4th) 289 ....................................................
-
Table of Cases
...v Van Gorkhom, 488 A2d 858 (Del SC 1985) ..........................................421 Smith, Stone and Knight Ltd v Birmingham Corp, [1939] 4 All ER 116, 161 LT 371, 104 JP 31, 83 Sol J 961, 37 LGR 665 (KB) .........150, 151, 152 Snively v Canada, 2011 TCC 196 ...................................
-
Broadening the Extraterritorial Reach of Australia's Cartel Prohibition: Adopting the ‘Effects’ Doctrine without the Negative Effects
...1, 23. 84 These factors were considered by Atkinson J in Smith, Stone & Knight Ltd v Lord Mayor Alderman and Citizens of Birmingham [1939] 4 All ER 116. 85 Amalgamated Wireless (Australasia) Ltd v McDonnell Douglas Corporation (1987) 16 FCR 238, 240–1. 2010 Extraterritorial Reach of Austral......
Request a trial to view additional results