Smith v Barking, Havering and Brentwood Health Authority

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1994
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
16 cases
  • Marie O'Carroll v Paul F Diamond (practising as Paul F Diamond and Company Solicitors)
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 12 April 2005
    ...WHEELER UNREP NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL 23.5.1997 CHATTERTON v GERSON 1981 1 QB 432 HILLS v POTTER 1984 1 WLR 641 SMITH v BARKING 1994 5 MED LR 285 GEOGHEGAN v HARRIS 2000 3 IR 536 NEGLIGENCE Solicitors Non- client - Requirement to advise party who was not client to obtain independen......
  • Geoghegan v Harris
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 21 June 2000
    ...CONSENT TO MEDICAL TREATMENT" 1981 97 LQR 102 CHATTERTON V GERSON 1981 1 QB 432 HILLS V POTTER 1984 1 WLR 641 SMITH V BARKING 1994 5 MED LR 285 SIDAWAY V BETHLEM ROYAL HOSPITAL GOVERNORS 1985 1 AER 643 JACKSON & POWELL PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE 3ED PARA 6.128 BOLAM V FRIERN HOSPITAL MANAGEME......
  • Chester v Afshar
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 14 October 2004
    ...a successful claim, the claimant would presumably succeed even in a case like Smith v Barking, Havering and Brentwood Health Authority [1994] 5 Med LR 285, where it is found on the balance of probabilities that the claimant would have consented to the operation even if properly advised. Tha......
  • Rosenberg v Percival
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 5 April 2001
    ...17 NSWLR 553 at 559–560, 581. 54 (1985) 39 SASR 543 at 566. 55 (1985) 39 SASR 543 at 566. 56 (1998) 195 CLR 232 at 247–248 [34]. 57 (1994) 5 Med LR 285 at 58 (1947) 75 CLR 125 at 132. 59 (1999) 199 CLR 575 at 586 [26]–[28]. 60 (1998) 195 CLR 232 at 235–236. 61 (1998) 195 CLR 232 at 240 [12]......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Let's Talk: The Need for Effective Communication between Doctor and Patient
    • Ireland
    • Cork Online Law Review No. 4-2005, January 2005
    • 1 January 2005
    ...of opportunity to bank his sperm in the event the procedure would leave him infertile. Also Smith v Barking, Havering & Brentwood HA (1994) 5 Med LR 285 the plaintiff sued for loss of opportunity to contemplate the prospect of a bad result, leading to additional shock 4 COLR 2005 VI. Obviou......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT