Smith v Chief Superintendent, Woking Police Station

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1983
Year1983
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Roberts v The State
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • Court of Appeal (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • 29 July 2008
    ...- or recklessly - causes another to apprehend immediate unlawful violence: R v. Venna [1976] Q.B. 421 at 429; Smith v. Chief Superintendent Working Police Station, 76 Cr. App. R. 234, DC; R v. Ireland; R v. Burstow [1998] A.C. 147, HL. The Act must be accompanied by a hostile intent calcul......
  • R v Ireland; R v Burstow
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 29 July 1996
    ...action causing the effect on the victim's mind… The ' mens rea' is the intention to cause that effect." 14 Smith v. Chief Superintendent, Woking Police Station (1983) 76 Cr.App.R. 234, is an important case for the purpose of this appeal. The defendant was charged under section 4 of the Vagr......
  • 香港特別行政區 訴 陳俊傑
    • Hong Kong
    • Court of Appeal (Hong Kong)
    • 11 October 2021
    ...17 HKCFAR 218:第123至124段。 [32] The Queen v Ling Lai Mo CACC 221/1985:第19段。 [33] Smith v Chief Superintendent, Woking Police Station (1983) 76 Cr App R 234。 [34] L v Director of Public Prosecutions [2008] 1 Cr App R 8 [35] 判詞第123和124段。 [36] R v Secretary of State for Health, ex p Ha...
  • Ejueyitsi v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs
    • Australia
    • Federal Magistrates Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
3 books & journal articles
  • Sticks, Stones and Words: Emotional Harm and the English Criminal Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 74-6, December 2010
    • 1 December 2010
    ...2006) 96.80 P. Charleton, Offences Against the Person (Dublin, Round Hall Press, 1992) 197; R vHorncastle (1972) 4 NBR (2d) 821.81 (1983) 76 Cr App R 234.82 Ibid. at 237–8; R v Ireland; Burstow [1998] AC 147 at 162 (Lord Steyn).83 [1997] 2 Cr App R 492.Sticks, Stones and Words: Emotional Ha......
  • ‘Psychological’ assault: The crime of assault revisited
    • South Africa
    • Juta South African Criminal Law Journal No. , August 2019
    • 16 August 2019
    ...(n58) 306.75 See for example the cases of R v Chan-Fook [1994] 1 WLR 689 at 696E; Smith v Chief Superintendent Woking Police Station (1983) 76 Cr App R 234.76 See R v Ireland, R v Burstow supra (n5) at 236. Card, Cross & Jones op cit (n3) 191. Controversy exists over whether ‘immediate forc......
  • Assault and S 47 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 59-3, August 1995
    • 1 August 1995
    ...The HouseofLords affirmed herconviction under s 47.10 See Logdon v DPP[1976JCrim LR 121; Smith v SuperintendentofWoking Police Station(1983) 76Cr App R 234.II Fagan vMPC[1968J3 All ER 442.12 See Hare (1993) MLR 74; Bell and Harrison (1993) MLR 83.13 Criminal Appeal Act 1968, s 3.14 Per Glid......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT