Smith v HM Revenue and Customs

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Neutral Citation[2011] UKUT 270 (TCC)
Date2011
CourtUpper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
12 cases
  • Sub One Limited T/A Subway v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
    • 3 Octubre 2012
    ...to findings of fact made by the First Tier Tribunal in a number of decisions: see e.g. Smith v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2011] UKUT 270 (TCC), [2011] STC 1724 at [46]-[50]. The Tribunal had the advantage of seeing and hearing Mrs Mulligan give her evidence. The Tribunal explained i......
  • The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v Astral Construction Limited
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
    • 20 Enero 2015
    ...and the approach that the Tribunal should take to an appeal such as this were conveniently set out by Arnold J in Smith v HMRC [2011] UKUT 270 (TCC); [2011] STC 1724, at [46] – [50]. From those authorities, it is clear that we can only allow the appeal if we are satisfied that there was an ......
  • HMRC v Europlus Trading Ltd FTC/38/2012
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
    • 1 Marzo 2013
    ...that the tribunal should take to an appeal such as this were conveniently set out by Arnold J in Smith v Revenue and Customs Comrs [2011] UKUT 270 (TCC) at [46]–[50], [2011] STC 1724 at From those authorities, it is clear that we can only allow the appeal if we are satisfied that there was ......
  • TC03780: Karen Rotberg
    • United Kingdom
    • First Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)
    • 7 Julio 2014
    ... ... , then Mrs Rotberg had been "seriously misled by inaccurate information from the Inland Revenue". [32]There was further correspondence between Mr Michell and HMRC, and on 5 May 2006 HMRC issued ... That follows from the discussion of the proper test by Arnold J in the Upper Tribunal in Smith v R & C CommrsTAX [2011] BTC 1742 where, at [92], he rejected an argument on behalf of Mr Smith ... jurisdiction in terms of assessing the reasonableness of a decision of what was then HM Customs and Excise, clear words would have been necessary, and that the specific headings of appeal ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT